Re: kathleen ANSWER THE QUESTIONS YOU LIAR!

So freaking what?

KATHLEEN IT AIN'T FUNNY STOP THE LIES YOU LYING LIAR!


Featured in Court & Police


Kathleen Dickson
Published on 5/8/2004


Kathleen Dickson, 46, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Thursday



with being a fugitive from justice.


© The Day Publishing Co., 2004


Featured in Court & Police


Kathleen Dickson


Published on 5/9/2004


Kathleen Dickson, 45, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Friday
with second-degree harassment and threatening.


© The Day Publishing Co., 2004


ANSWER THE QUESTIONS KATHLEEN


Let's see how you like it kathleen EVERY time you post, I will change
the title of the thread and I will post these questions until you
answer them one by one and answering them means NOT talking about
mcsweegan or former governor rowland and all your typical diversionary
crap anyway.


PLUS you are cross posting ONCE AGAIN TOTALLY OFF TOPIC and you're
selfish to do this to one newsgroups CRIMINAL to do it to multiple
newsgroups--yes here is your "crime": You are preventing people who
need help from getting help for your selfish personal reasons that you
are so completely egocentric along with delusional paranoid
schizophrenic with psychotic features that you just can't see past your



own twisted delusional psychotic personal agenda--which ought to be
about getting your kids back and solving your own enormous problems in
life instead of trying to solve anyone else's. By preventing people
from getting help you are responsible for the consequences. Surely
people are dying as a result so you are a murderer (trying out a little



kathleen "logic" here. So you are now being reported to the DOJ FBI and



CIA and WHO and UN and DCF and the federal and state courts and
homeland insanity department and all over the planet as a murderer.


How do you like them apples?


Now answer the questions. And stop the off topic cross posting. Answer
the questions TRUTHFULLY for a change. Focus on the question. If
there's a question yOU don't understand which is hard to believe given
your self declared genius IQ, let us know and we'll rephrase it.


Don't LIE as you do and don't try your diversionary tactics. Ignore
this and I will keep reposting it kathleen. Not only that but your
silence will be construed as admissions to all OF the facts listed as
questions.


PS: This is NOT "taunting" You have put your credibility at issue. You
have repeatedly said that you NEVER lie. We deserve the answers to
these questions. Straight answers.


REPOST:


http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thre...



Nope we're talking about YOU. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS


And come back and tell us when Steere or McSweegan or anyone else is
actually charged with your "Lyme Crymes" instead of telling us what
you, in all your infinite wisdom, think will happen.


Now let's talk not about who WILL be convicted but WHO already has
been--YOU.


Here's the question list. One by one give us some answers. Your post is



just like the Bush White House trying to DIVERT attention from what
Karl Rove did to Joe Wilson--by attacking him AGAIN.


Nope answer the questions kathleen. Stop trying to change the subject.


I know you're delusional but try to focus. Here is a list of questions
for YOU. We've already heard your ramblings about 100,000 times. Now
dish some TRUTH for a change--I'm going to leave space between the
questions for your answers:


Was your case appealed and was your conviction overturned?


And what isn't true? Everything can be backed up with your own posts
kathleen. Not a big secret how people know since you posted it all
here.


Were you charged with and convicted of threatening and harassing
Jessica Gauvin?


Did you flee to Canada?


Did you tell everyone that your case was a custody case against DCF
when the truth was that it was a criminal case against you and your
kids had been taken away many months earlier and you didn't even appeal



that?


Did you threaten to bomb the stonington schools, joke or not?


Did you show up at your kid's safe house with a bag full of drugs
whether you meant to give them to your lawyer or not?


Come on specifically what isn't true?


You were charged tried and convicted in a court of law. Right or wrong,



admit or deny?


Now you say you've proven you're innocent.


In what court were your convictions overturned?


In fact, tell us what the charges were. Give some detail. What exactly
were you convicted of doing or threatening to do to Jessica Gauvin?


Tell us what your diagnosis was in the mental institution?


You admit or deny that your kids were taken away by child services in
CT?


Admit or deny you were charged with crimes?


Admit or deny you feld to canada?


Admit or deny you were convicted?


Admit or deny you were institutionalized in a mental ward locked wing?


Admit or deny that your convictions were never reversed, in fact you
never filed an appeal did you?


So who's lying about what?


Yeah sure, you say everyone lied about the charges. But that's not what



the court thought was it?


Did you register a website claiming on it you were working for Pfizer
at the time when you had "retired" years before?


Was Lymeraft which solicited funds for YOU, ever a proper legally
registered charity?


kathleen you're the liar here.


Do you really expect everyone to believe that the rest of the world is
crazy, not you?


And that the rest if the world has conspired to frame you? Because of
your lyme activism which you have even admitted amounts to more posting



on the internet than any real accomplishments?


Come on kathleen. What isn't true specifically issue by issue above.


Tell us specifically which items you say aren't true. We can go back
and find the posts where you admitted stuff and show what a liar YOU
are!



Chuck wrote:
> "It was the first President Bush who once described anyone who exposed
> intelligence assets as "the most insidious of traitors."
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/07/25/rove.problem.tm.tm/
>
> ----
> "Dr. Edward McSweegan
> Naval Medical Research Institute
> Bethesda, Md. 20814
> 202-295-0328 (lab)
> 301-654-6614 (home)
> August 13, 1986
>
>
> Sen. Barry Goldwater
> 363 Russell Senate Office Bldg.
> Washington, D.C. 20510
>
> Dear Sen. Goldwater,
>
> I am a Naval Research Council Fellow currently attached to the Naval
> Medical Research Institute (NMRI) in Bethesda. I have been engaged in
> post-doctoral research for this institute for the last 22 months. In
> that time I have come to conclude that the Navy'[s in-house research
> efforts are seriously misdirected, and that the funds consumed in these
> efforts could be better utilized in other places. I decided,
> therefore, to write to you about my observations and conclusions.
>
> The Naval Medical Research Institute is engaged in a variety of
> research programs. These include everything from "biotechnology"
> and schistomiasis to diarrheal disease, malaria, and hyperbaric
> physiology. Much of this work is basic science. This type of research
> is essentially identical to that being done in any number of
> universities, federal civilian institutes, and biotech companies. So,
> in the face of the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings deficit-cutting program, one
> has to ask why it is that the Navy is engaged in attempting to
> duplicate the research efforts of the private federal civilian sectors?
>
> Nothing that is now being done at NMRI is not being done somewhere
> else. For example, less than 5 miles from here is the sprawling Walter
> Reed Army Medical Center. They are engaged in essentially the same
> vaccine development, and malaria and diarrheal studies that we are
> working on. (Interestingly the Army is funding most of the research
> that we are doing.) Across the street from my office is NIH. NIH does
> some of the most important AIDS research in the world. Yet, the Navy
> has determined that it must have its own, independent AIDS research
> program. This program will be at least 5 years behind the NIH effort,
> and will serve only to send NMRI personnel and taxpayer money down a
> road already well-travelled by researchers in Boston, New York, L.A.,
> Paris, and Bethesda.
>
> This is not to say that the Navy, and the rest of the DoD, do not have
> legitimate interests in AIDS, or vaccines, or other biomedical
> research. My concern is that they themselves do this type of work so
> poorly, so redundantly, and so expensively.
>
> The main reason for the poor research performance is undoubtedly due
> to a lack of management. Let me give you some personal examples of an
> institute in managerial decay. ........ (more)
>
>
> ....."I'm certain that the DoD would attempt to make a clear case for
> its
> continued in-house research programs. Yet, the defense department does
> not feel the need to make its own fighter planes, or Christmas
> fruitcakes,
> or nerve gas, or acetylcholinesterase. Why then do they feel the need
> to have
> their own programs to study the mechanisms of campylobacter diarrhea,
> or
> lectin-ligand interactions, or the cloning of rickettsial surface
> protein genes? [OspA] These are projects for university graduates, not
> Navy and Army
> lieutenants. If the DoD thinks that these are topics of military
> importance they should be willing to fund the research in the form of
> grants to universities, and contacts to businesses. The end result
> will be a leaner, cheaper defense department and stronger universities
> and biotechnical businesses. Everyone would benefit...."
>
> ... (more)...
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Dr. Edward McSweegan
>
>
> P.S. Copies of this letter have been sent to 20 other
> senators and representatives. A list of recipients is
> available upon request.
> I apologise for the quality of the printer and the
> paper, but it was all that I had available."
> ==============================================================

.