Re: kathleen.dickson @ snet.net LIAR!

"Dr. Edward McSweegan
Naval Medical Research Institute
Bethesda, Md. 20814
202-295-0328 (lab)
301-654-6614 (home)
August 13, 1986


Sen. Barry Goldwater
363 Russell Senate Office Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Sen. Goldwater,

I am a Naval Research Council Fellow currently attached to the Naval
Medical Research
Institute (NMRI) in Bethesda. I have been engaged in post-doctoral
research for
this institute for the last 22 months. In that time I have come to
conclude that
the Navyâ??[s in-house research efforts are seriously misdirected,
and that the
funds consumed in these efforts could be better utilized in other
places. I decided,
therefore, to write to you about my observations and conclusions.

The Naval Medical Research Institute is engaged in a variety of
research programs.
These include everything from â??biotechnologyâ?? and
schistomiasis to diarrheal
disease, malaria, and hyperbaric physiology. Much of this work is
basic science.
This type of research is essentially identical to that being done in
any number
of universities, federal civilian institutes, and biotech companies.
So, in the
face of the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings deficit-cutting program, one has to
ask why it
is that the Navy is engaged in attempting to duplicate the research
efforts of the
private federal civilian sectors?

Nothing that is now being done at NMRI is not being done somewhere
else. For example,
less than 5 miles from here is the sprawling Walter Reed Army Medical
Center. They
are engaged in essentially the same vaccine development, and malaria
and diarrheal
studies that we are working on. (Interestingly the Army is funding
most of the
research that we are doing.) Across the street from my office is NIH.
NIH does
some of the most important AIDS research in the world. Yet, the Navy
has determined
that it must have its own, independent AIDS research program. This
program will
be at least 5 years behind the NIH effort, and will serve only to send
NMRI personnel
and taxpayer money down a road already well-travelled by researchers in
Boston,
New York, L.A., Paris, and Bethesda.

This is not to say that the Navy, and the rest of the DoD, do not have
legitimate
interests in AIDS, or vaccines, or other biomedical research. My
concern is that
they themselves do this type of work so poorly, so redundantly, and so
expensively.

The main reason for the poor research performance is undoubtedly due
to a lack
of management. Let me give you some personal examples of an institute
in managerial
decay. ........ (more)


......"I'm certain that the DoD would attempt to make a clear case for
its
continued in-house research programs. Yet, the defense department does
not feel the need to make its own fighter planes, or Christmas
fruitcakes,
or nerve gas, or acetylcholinesterase. Why then do they feel the need
to have
their own programs to study the mechanisms of campylobacter diarrhea,
or
lectin-ligand interactions, or the cloning of rickettsial surface
protein genes?
[OspA] These are projects for university graduates, not Navy and Army
lieutenants. If the DoD thinks that these are topics of military
importance they
should be willing to fund the research in the form of grants to
universities, and
contacts to businesses. The end result will be a leaner, cheaper
defense department
and stronger universities and biotechnical businesses. Everyone would
benefit...."

.... (more)...


Sincerely,

Dr. Edward McSweegan


P.S. Copies of this letter have been sent to 20 other
senators and representatives. A list of recipients is
available upon request.
I apologise for the quality of the printer and the
paper, but it was all that I had available."
==============================================================

lisasawitch wrote:
> KATHLEEN IT AIN'T FUNNY STOP THE LIES YOU LYING LIAR!
>
>
> Featured in Court & Police
>
>
> Kathleen Dickson
> Published on 5/8/2004
>
>
> Kathleen Dickson, 46, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Thursday
> with being a fugitive from justice.
>
>
> © The Day Publishing Co., 2004
>
>
> Featured in Court & Police
>
>
> Kathleen Dickson
>
>
> Published on 5/9/2004
>
>
> Kathleen Dickson, 45, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Friday
> with second-degree harassment and threatening.
>
>
> © The Day Publishing Co., 2004
>
>
> ANSWER THE QUESTIONS KATHLEEN
>
>
> Let's see how you like it kathleen EVERY time you post, I will change
> the title of the thread and I will post these questions until you
> answer them one by one and answering them means NOT talking about
> mcsweegan or former governor rowland and all your typical diversionary
> crap anyway.
>
>
> PLUS you are cross posting ONCE AGAIN TOTALLY OFF TOPIC and you're
> selfish to do this to one newsgroups CRIMINAL to do it to multiple
> newsgroups--yes here is your "crime": You are preventing people who
> need help from getting help for your selfish personal reasons that you
> are so completely egocentric along with delusional paranoid
> schizophrenic with psychotic features that you just can't see past your
> own twisted delusional psychotic personal agenda--which ought to be
> about getting your kids back and solving your own enormous problems in
> life instead of trying to solve anyone else's. By preventing people
> from getting help you are responsible for the consequences. Surely
> people are dying as a result so you are a murderer (trying out a little
> kathleen "logic" here. So you are now being reported to the DOJ FBI and
> CIA and WHO and UN and DCF and the federal and state courts and
> homeland insanity department and all over the planet as a murderer.
>
>
> How do you like them apples?
>
>
> Now answer the questions. And stop the off topic cross posting. Answer
> the questions TRUTHFULLY for a change. Focus on the question. If
> there's a question yOU don't understand which is hard to believe given
> your self declared genius IQ, let us know and we'll rephrase it.
>
>
> Don't LIE as you do and don't try your diversionary tactics. Ignore
> this and I will keep reposting it kathleen. Not only that but your
> silence will be construed as admissions to all OF the facts listed as
> questions.
>
>
> PS: This is NOT "taunting" You have put your credibility at issue. You
> have repeatedly said that you NEVER lie. We deserve the answers to
> these questions. Straight answers.
>
>
> REPOST:
>
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thre...
>
>
>
> Nope we're talking about YOU. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
>
>
> And come back and tell us when Steere or McSweegan or anyone else is
> actually charged with your "Lyme Crymes" instead of telling us what
> you, in all your infinite wisdom, think will happen.
>
>
> Now let's talk not about who WILL be convicted but WHO already has
> been--YOU.
>
>
> Here's the question list. One by one give us some answers. Your post is
> just like the Bush White House trying to DIVERT attention from what
> Karl Rove did to Joe Wilson--by attacking him AGAIN.
>
>
> Nope answer the questions kathleen. Stop trying to change the subject.
>
> I know you're delusional but try to focus. Here is a list of questions
> for YOU. We've already heard your ramblings about 100,000 times. Now
> dish some TRUTH for a change--I'm going to leave space between the
> questions for your answers:
>
>
> Was your case appealed and was your conviction overturned?
>
>
> And what isn't true? Everything can be backed up with your own posts
> kathleen. Not a big secret how people know since you posted it all
> here.
>
>
> Were you charged with and convicted of threatening and harassing
> Jessica Gauvin?
>
>
> Did you flee to Canada?
>
>
> Did you tell everyone that your case was a custody case against DCF
> when the truth was that it was a criminal case against you and your
> kids had been taken away many months earlier and you didn't even appeal
> that?
>
>
> Did you threaten to bomb the stonington schools, joke or not?
>
>
> Did you show up at your kid's safe house with a bag full of drugs
> whether you meant to give them to your lawyer or not?
>
>
> Come on specifically what isn't true?
>
>
> You were charged tried and convicted in a court of law. Right or wrong,
> admit or deny?
>
>
> Now you say you've proven you're innocent.
>
>
> In what court were your convictions overturned?
>
>
> In fact, tell us what the charges were. Give some detail. What exactly
> were you convicted of doing or threatening to do to Jessica Gauvin?
>
>
> Tell us what your diagnosis was in the mental institution?
>
>
> You admit or deny that your kids were taken away by child services in
> CT?
>
>
> Admit or deny you were charged with crimes?
>
>
> Admit or deny you feld to canada?
>
>
> Admit or deny you were convicted?
>
>
> Admit or deny you were institutionalized in a mental ward locked wing?
>
>
> Admit or deny that your convictions were never reversed, in fact you
> never filed an appeal did you?
>
>
> So who's lying about what?
>
>
> Yeah sure, you say everyone lied about the charges. But that's not what
> the court thought was it?
>
>
> Did you register a website claiming on it you were working for Pfizer
> at the time when you had "retired" years before?
>
>
> Was Lymeraft which solicited funds for YOU, ever a proper legally
> registered charity?
>
>
> kathleen you're the liar here.
>
>
> Do you really expect everyone to believe that the rest of the world is
> crazy, not you?
>
>
> And that the rest if the world has conspired to frame you? Because of
> your lyme activism which you have even admitted amounts to more posting
> on the internet than any real accomplishments?
>
>
> Come on kathleen. What isn't true specifically issue by issue above.
>
>
> Tell us specifically which items you say aren't true. We can go back
> and find the posts where you admitted stuff and show what a liar YOU
> are!
>
>
>
>
> kathleen wrote:
> > Another McSweegan alias.
> >
> > In addition to Chuck,
> > Nadie, Anon @ cotse, Siboney...
> >
> > That's at least 5 aliases.
> >
> > I think I forgot one.
> >
> > Kathleen

.