Re: Frank,


<derdrittemann2003@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1126452062.442474.201130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Cytyzens Agaynst Lyme Cryme wrote:
> >
> > None of your GODDAMNED business, Dirtyman.
> >
>
> ROFLAMAO!!! HAHAHAHAHHAHHAHA!!!
>
> YEAH!!! EXACTLY what I thought!
>
> Don't you know? Don't you want to share with us?
>
> This s--t put me in the hospital within five months of the bite...I
> happen to know exactly when the offending bite took place. Neurological
> trouble, eye trouble, heart trouble...still can't walk or speak too
> well.


Dirtyman,
who here, whose been here for just a little while
doesn't know you're a phony and NOT a sufferer of LD?
but,
allowing you the slightest of benefits of the doubt-
maybe you did get infected with a devil of a strain of Bb,
and it skipped over the Boardwalk, hopped past Park Place,
did not stop to collect $200 and went STRAIGHT to your Brain!
Because you shore nuff be whacked out enuff for that to have happened.


> And yet...you are not only NOT dead...you are well enough to spout off
> your foul-mouthed luna-tick howlings 24/7.


Okay, we know that Tourette's Syndrome is one of your manifestations
of whatever "disease" you have, so you can stuff the "foul" back
in your own mouth.
And,
where is the scientific fact that someone with LD should be DEAD
within a thirty year timeframe?

I've read of many that have suffered decades with LD.
A few for a lifetime.
Like, Dr. Joanne Whittaker
*a Lyme disease victim from childhood*,
has developed a reliable test for the presence of Lyme disease.
This test looks for the Bb organism, not antibodies, and is able
to identify the cell wall deficient (CWD) form of the spirochete
as well as the actual Bb organism. The test is called Q-RIBb
which stands for quantitative rapid identification of Bb.

Dr. Lida Mattman has confirmed that Dr. Whitaker's test
is sensitive because there has been a 100 % correlation
between a postive culture of Bb by Dr. Mattman's lab
and a postive Q-RIBb test from Dr. Whitaker's Laboratory.

I heard a speech by Dr. Whittaker and she looks to be in her 70s,
so what timelines, or actuarial tables can you produce, Dirtyman
to support your contention that I should be DEAD by now?!


> Gee...you must live in Lyme, Connecticut if you've had it for 30 years.


Gee, no. Haven't you read EvilChuck, your buddy, who has "fingered"
me as living in a trailer park in South Philly?


> Do you know Ms. Murray? Funny you seem to know so little about the
> disease, though...living so close to Plum Island and all.


I admit, I'm learning, f i n a l l y , learning about the disease
I've been struggling with the majority of my adult life.

I'm not a Born-Know-It-All, like you Dirtyman.


> You see, these..."I've had it for 30 year types" are a sort of
> irregular feature of Lymeland...why some seem to think this bizarre
> claim confers some sort of status on themelves is beyond me.


Whaaa...?! only YOU would claim that others claim longterm LD
gives them "status" or IS some perverse form of Status Symbol.


> So what are your symptoms, sweetie...


One of the main symptoms I've always presented with
is an almost life-threatening ALLERGIC Reaction
to Bull*** Goons-For-Hire like you, Dirtyman.
(hence, our rather unpleasant exchanges)


> please tell us how you've survived
> untreated all this time, won't you?

D'Oh!
I don't know, since according to you we all :
Manifest the SAME symptoms.
Have the symptoms at the SAME times.
Require the SAME types and lengths of hospitalization.
Are infected with the SAME strain of Bb.
ALL have the SAME biochemistry.
ALL have the SAME immune response.
ALL have the SAME gender, weight, height, age, etc.
We all are just One Big Homogenized Group of Lymies...
Ad Infinitum.

Why don't you re-read Frank's article.
He gave such a good definition of "tropism".

And when, where, did I write that I went untreated for 30 years?
I went untreated for LYME, idjit.
For the last thirty years, I have tried more modalities than
Carter Has Liver Pills.
Musta done myself some good, living such a clean life and all,
that I staved off the ravages of LD somewhat,
and schmaybe I got infected initially with a nice sweet grandmotherly
strain of Bb that promised to hurt me just a little and realllll slow.
But,
I do think that now, the way I'm falling apart, I've even reached
the end stages of that lesser virulent strain of Bb.


> I guess this means you weren't diagnosed via serology, because there's
> NO WAY you are going to show antibody response after thirty years.


Uhhh, yeah Einstein... and that negative Western Blot
would only be a CONFIRMATION of Lyme, wouldn't it?...
along with a studied, clinical, diagnostic opinion...
oh!, and also along with a positive serological test for antigens,
NOT antibodies.
DWEEB!


> So...how were you diagnosed?
>
> Let me guess...you met this person...Kathleen M. Dickson...on a mental
> illness discussion board...and SHE convinced you that you had Lyme
> disease...
>
> ...RIGHT?

wOw! . . . are you a spook? a spoon-bender? HOW did you know?!?

What I do KNOW, is that I'll have to admit I was stupid
for these last fifteen minutes, that I actually replied to a Dirtybag
like you, and that I will never ever get those 15 minutes back.
Oh well,
I'll rationalize that I wrote the above for some possibly interested party,
a newbie, a lurker, a surfer. Whatever. Nevermind.

CALC






>


.

Quantcast