Re: Lyme Fraud Explainer, Simple Version


LymeRayja wrote:
>
> There neither is, was, nor will ever be any evidence in their
> "evidence-based medicine" - only falsification and coverup of evidence.

Yeah, well, if you're saying that "evidence-based" medicine is more of
an excuse, a justification, for what they want to believe than an
actual operative philosophy or method of medicine...you'll get no
argument from me, there.

I think if I were a physician, I would be absolutely horrified at this
approach.

I certainly am as a patient. And...if you really want to know...I think
this is at the root of so many problems Lyme patients have faced.

> > Their stated committment to the principles of "evidence-based" medicine
> > as a philosophy, however, is well-known. If you are suggesting that
> > they don't seem to follow those principles in
> > practice...well...damn...not my department. Just an observer.
>
> Ha!

HA-HA! HA-HA-HA-HA-HA, in fact.

> Those that have followed Burrascano's lead in suggesting a
> > "quid pro quo" in the writing of insurance guidelines simply don't know
> > how insurance companies work.
> >
> > They are NOT, for instance, going to solicit Burrascano, Liegner, or
> > anyone else who advocates ivs or longterm ivs, to write the guidelines.
> >
> > They hire those with conservative views.
>
> They hire those who will whore for them, sacrificing the entire chronic
> Lyme patient community in the process.

Well, it really is a chicken-egg question, though.
>
> >
> > The problem is that many have ASSUMED the views were held in exchange
> > for cash. That has to be proven. There is abenign interpretation
> > available and that explanation is SUPPOSED to be accepted as operative
> > until contrary evidence suggests otherwise.
>
> Only in cloud cuckoo-land.

NO!!! In actual COURTS OF LAW where it counts. "Cuckoo-land" is where
you live along with KathLOON.

See, Burrascano was NOT subject to libel law in front of Congress where
there is an absolute privilege.

But everyone else is. And when you say that physicians are "doctoring"
their views in exchange for cash...that's libellous, per se...and you
damn well better be able to prove that.

But there is nothing wrong with hiring doctors who already have a
conservative philosophy, so far as I know...fully expecting them to
write what the insurance company wants.

If it's your job to choose...and you want to retain your job...you do
not hire someone who prescribes multiple IVs.



> Yes, you said ALL of those things. Not specifically, perhaps. but you
> made a general statement that the massive conflicts of interest held by
> virtually all the ley Steere camp people is not a motive for their
> anti-patient, abusive distortion of Lyme medicine.

Did I? Or did I say that you need to provide EVIDENCE with which to
prove those charges?
>
> > YOU DIDN'T BOTHER...EVER...TO LISTEN...YOU MISERABLE TWISTED SADISTIC
> > BITCH.
>
> YOU call ME sadistic? YOU?

OH, YEAH!!! And you just proved what a liar and truth-twister you
really are...by excising the portion of what I had just said that
causes you some discomfort...in other words, the TRUTH.

You just attack any Lyme patient who stands up and has the courage to
disagree with Kathleen, who is a disturbed nutcase. That's your mission
in life, apparently. Cheering on a schizo-whackjob to self-destruction.


Good job, there. Brilliant.

You talk about what awful things the "Steere Camp" has done in denying
the severity of Lyme disease out of one corner of your foul mouth,
while tearing into suffering Lyme patients out of the other.

God, you are disgusting. Beneath contempt. And encouraging Kathleen,
who is clearly not well. What in the hell is wrong with you?
>
> You who have joined Weisman and Chuck in countless abuse against my
> children, Kathleen's, and against the Lyme patient community as a
> whole?

Oh yeah? I did? You saying that I attacked your children? Where?
Bull***. See, that's the kind of LIAR you are. A wretched polluted
fountain of LIES.

Speaking of LIES...WHATEVER HAPPENED with your child custody matter?

You aren't seriously going to try to tell us that it is still pending
are you?
And that you can't discuss it?

LOL.

> > >
> > You have to PROVE this. HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO TELL YOU? YOU
> > CANNOT JUST RUN AROUND SHOUTING AT THE MOON...YOU HAVE TO BE ABLE TO
> > PROVE IT.
>
> Yes Mister Dirt Ritteman. We most certainly will.

Well, "just do it", then.

Talk is cheap. Get on with it.

.

Quantcast