Re: Dr Jones the mistakes so far
- From: "Mockingbird" <mockingbirdbrain@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Nov 2005 07:27:40 -0800
kathyk wrote:
> well, the details here are what is important. for instance, did jones
> prescribe a round of oral doxy {relatively harmless} until the kid
> could get to see him in person {he's got a big backlog}, or did dr.
> jones prescribe IV abx, which would have been very irresponsible.
I hate to speculate but from his letter it appears that he Rxd
treatment for five or six months until the kid could get in to see him.
AND though I don't disagree with your SENTIMENT here, the standard is
NOT what YOU think.
So, if CT state board and accepted medical practice REQUIRES a physical
examination in person and/or proper documentation for a diagnosis, and
Dr Jones didn't have it, it doesn't matter what YOU think is
acceptable. Also, every state requires proper record keeping.
And there could be issues regarding insurance billiings which require
proper documentation.
> I can't imagine an LLMD prescribing IV meds without seeing the patient
> and ALSO having a local GP willing to work with Dr. Jones.
I've heard of IV being prescribed without seeing a patient. More than
once.
I do think that Dr Jones would have been well advised to work with a
local doctor, consulting UNTIL he could see the kid and then have a
local doctor available and on board in case something happened when the
kid was in Utah between Jones visits.
> My docs certainly NEVER would do such a thing.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dr Jones the mistakes so far
- From: Greatcod
- Re: Dr Jones the mistakes so far
- References:
- Dr Jones the mistakes so far
- From: Mockingbird
- Re: Dr Jones the mistakes so far
- From: kathyk
- Dr Jones the mistakes so far
- Prev by Date: Re: kathLOON is McSweegan Obsessed, I think she's in love?
- Next by Date: Re: CALC = KATHLEEN
- Previous by thread: Re: Dr Jones the mistakes so far
- Next by thread: Re: Dr Jones the mistakes so far
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading