Re: kathLOON is a permanent newsgroup infection (and a vile anti semitic nazi propoganda loving piece of ***)

A part of KathLOON's holocaust denying vile anti semitic crap can be
found at:
See:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thread/th...



Time for the whacko to answer some questions:


What gives a sick piece of *** like you the right to mercilessly
defame the names of good public serveants like richard
blumenthal, kevin O'connor, Jessica Gauvin, Judge Clifford etc.


You're a LOSER


Who's the loser kathLOON? Who's life consists of posting 24/7/365
instead of having a family, taking care of your children, getting
yourself the mental help you so DESPERATELY need?


Who has no job, no family, no prospects, no friends? And a record of
felony conviction and institutionalization?


YOU!


Look in the mirror to see the LOSER!
Such as KATHLEEN DICKSON!!!


You've been blathering the same thing for YEARS and the scorecard still



reads:


kathLOON: charged, convicted, sentenced, no appeal FELON


Kathloon's proclaimed enemies: all free and clear


(no governor rowland doesn't count since you had NOTHING to do with
it!)


And your bizarre and delusional OBSESSIONS about mcsweegan are as
baseless as your soon to be dismissed lawsuits.


Get some help kathLOON.


Come on kathLOON. It is TIME to FINALLY answer the questions.


Tell us WHAT is NOT TRUE about you:
You were accused tried and convicted did not appeal and never have had
anyone but you declare yourself innocent or the charges false.


Shut up already. And answer the questions below.


You're a DELIBERATE LIAR!


KATHLEEN IT AIN'T FUNNY STOP THE LIES YOU LYING LIAR!


Featured in Court & Police


Kathleen Dickson
Published on 5/8/2004


Kathleen Dickson, 46, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Thursday



with being a fugitive from justice.


© The Day Publishing Co., 2004


Featured in Court & Police


Kathleen Dickson


Published on 5/9/2004


Kathleen Dickson, 45, of 23 Garden St., Pawcatuck, was charged Friday
with second-degree harassment and threatening.


© The Day Publishing Co., 2004


ANSWER THE QUESTIONS KATHLEEN


Let's see how you like it kathleen EVERY time you post, I will change
the title of the thread and I will post these questions until you
answer them one by one and answering them means NOT talking about
McSweegan or former Governor Rowland and all your typical diversionary
crap anyway.


PLUS you are cross posting ONCE AGAIN TOTALLY OFF TOPIC and you're
selfish to do this to one newsgroups CRIMINAL to do it to multiple
newsgroups--yes here is your "crime": You are preventing people who
need help from getting help for your selfish personal reasons that you
are so completely egocentric along with delusional paranoid
schizophrenic with psychotic features that you just can't see past your



own twisted delusional psychotic personal agenda--which ought to be
about getting your kids back and solving your own enormous problems in
life instead of trying to solve anyone else's. By preventing people
from getting help you are responsible for the consequences. Surely
people are dying as a result so you are a murderer (trying out a little



kathleen "logic" here. So you are now being reported to the DOJ FBI and



CIA and WHO and UN and DCF and the federal and state courts and
homeland insanity department and all over the planet as a murderer.


How do you like them apples?


Now answer the questions. And stop the off topic cross posting. Answer
the questions TRUTHFULLY for a change. Focus on the question. If
there's a question yOU don't understand which is hard to believe given
your self declared genius IQ, let us know and we'll rephrase it.


Don't LIE as you do and don't try your diversionary tactics. Ignore
this and I will keep reposting it kathleen. Not only that but your
silence will be construed as admissions to all OF the facts listed as
questions.


PS: This is NOT "taunting" You have put your credibility at issue. You
have repeatedly said that you NEVER lie. We deserve the answers to
these questions. Straight answers.


REPOST:


http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thre...



Nope we're talking about YOU. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS


And come back and tell us when Steere or McSweegan or anyone else is
actually charged with your "Lyme Crymes" instead of telling us what
you, in all your infinite wisdom, think will happen.


Now let's talk not about who WILL be convicted but WHO already has
been--YOU.


Here's the question list. One by one give us some answers. Your post is



just like the Bush White House trying to DIVERT attention from what
Karl Rove did to Joe Wilson--by attacking him AGAIN.


Nope answer the questions kathleen. Stop trying to change the subject.


I know you're delusional but try to focus. Here is a list of questions
for YOU. We've already heard your ramblings about 100,000 times. Now
dish some TRUTH for a change--I'm going to leave space between the
questions for your answers:


Was your case appealed and was your conviction overturned?


You CLAIM there is a court Order prohibiting you from criticizing the
government. Post it!


And what isn't true? Everything can be backed up with your own posts
kathleen. Not a big secret how people know since you posted it all
here.


Were you charged with and convicted of threatening and harassing
Jessica Gauvin?


Did you flee to Canada?


Did you tell everyone that your case was a custody case against DCF
when the truth was that it was a criminal case against you and your
kids had been taken away many months earlier and you didn't even appeal



that?


Did you threaten to bomb the stonington schools, joke or not?


Did you show up at your kid's safe house with a bag full of drugs
whether you meant to give them to your lawyer or not?


Come on specifically what isn't true?


You were charged tried and convicted in a court of law. Right or wrong,



admit or deny?


Now you say you've proven you're innocent.


In what court were your convictions overturned?


In fact, tell us what the charges were. Give some detail. What exactly
were you convicted of doing or threatening to do to Jessica Gauvin?


Tell us what your diagnosis was in the mental institution?


You admit or deny that your kids were taken away by child services in
CT?


Admit or deny you were charged with crimes?


Admit or deny you feld to canada?


Admit or deny you were convicted?


Admit or deny you were institutionalized in a mental ward locked wing?


Admit or deny that your convictions were never reversed, in fact you
never filed an appeal did you?


So who's lying about what?


Yeah sure, you say everyone lied about the charges. But that's not what



the court thought was it?


Did you register a website claiming on it you were working for Pfizer
at the time when you had "retired" years before?


Was Lymeraft which solicited funds for YOU, ever a proper legally
registered charity?


Kathleen you're the liar here.


Do you really expect everyone to believe that the rest of the world is
crazy, not you?


And that the rest if the world has conspired to frame you? Because of
your lyme activism which you have even admitted amounts to more posting



on the internet than any real accomplishments?
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thre...



Come on kathleen. What isn't true specifically issue by issue above.


Tell us specifically which items you say aren't true. We can go back
and find the posts where you admitted stuff and show what a liar YOU
are!


And see kathleen's post advocating cyberterrorism:


http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thre...



This is a federal crime. A SERIOUS Federal Crime. So do what you think
is right! By the way this is almost certainly a violation of her
probation/parole.


Kathleen Dickson


860-599-5451
23 Garden St., Pawcatuck 06379


Remember, she's provided everyone with contact information for the FBI
in New Haven: FBI New Haven 203-777-6311



kathleen wrote:
> 3 days is not enough time to observe if Bb grew.
>
> Kathleen
>
> kathleen wrote:
> > justin wrote:
> > > kathleen wrote:
> > > > KLEMPNER and ceftriaxone and persistence:
> > > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=1634816&query_hl=4
> > > >
> > >
> > > This study found that certain eukaryotic cell types help to protect
> > > Borrelia from the toxicity of ceftriaxone: "Thus, several eukaryotic
> > > cell types provide the Lyme disease spirochete with a protective
> > > environment contributing to its long-term survival."
> > >
> > > However, this applies only to ceftriaxone.
> > >
> > > Doxycycline penetrates these types of eukaryotic cells. See the
> > > following study:
> > >
> > > Eucaryotic cells protect Borrelia burgdorferi from the action of
> > > penicillin and ceftriaxone but not from the action of doxycycline and
> > > erythromycin.
> > >
> > > Brouqui P, Badiaga S, Raoult D.
> > >
> > > Unite des Rickettsies, Faculte de Medecine, Centre National de la
> > > Recherche Scientifique, Marseille, France.
> > >
> > > Despite appropriate antibiotic treatment, Lyme disease patients may
> > > have relapses or may develop chronic manifestations. The intracellular
> > > location of Borrelia burgdorferi suggests that antibiotics that
> > > penetrate cells will have greater efficiency. Doxycycline or
> > > erythromycin was more effective than penicillin or ceftriaxone in
> > > killing B. burgdorferi when the organism was grown in the presence of
> > > eucaryotic cells.
> > >
> > > PMID: 8726038 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
> > > ==========
> > >
> > > One of the problems with doxycycline is that it is often prescribed in
> > > dosages too low for this disease. Somewhere in the range of 400 and
> > > possibly up 600mg daily may be required to reach adequate levels in the
> > > brain, due to a low penetration rate into the CSF.
> >
> > Well that's too bad, because the CDC does not recognize foreign
> > research
> > and have said so.
> >
> > 1996.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Kathleen

.

Quantcast