Re: Absolutely no clue whatever

Durty,
What's "in for you" to be SOooo OBSESSED with Kathleen Dickson?
You're the Most ANAL entity I've ever encountered on the Net.

CALC


"Yukon King" <derdrittemann2003@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1133388028.564534.87660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Yukon King wrote:
>
> Yukon King wrote:
> > Here is an excerpt of what calls a "Motion to Dismiss"...(the Motion to
> > Dismiss, I guess):
>
>
> And just so everyone understands...
>
> ...when the defendant (Connecticut, here) files a "MOTION TO
> DISMISS"...
>
>
> ...the plaintiff then files a "RESPONSE" or "REPLY" to the MOTION TO
> DISMISS...
>
>
> ...and prays that the defendant's motions be "DENIED".
>
>
> You don't file a "Motion to dismiss the motion to dismiss".
>
>
> There is a responsive pleading to the Motion to Dismiss due December 2
> from the PLAINTIFF.
>
> And unless the PLAINTIFF responds and addresses the serious issues
> raised by the DEFENDANT, including, but not limited to, lack of in
> personam jurisdiction, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, improper
> venue, sovereign immunity, failure to state a cognizable cause of
> action upon which relief could be granted...
>
> ...the COURT will have no option but to DISMISS the alleged "class
> action" as requested by the DEFENDANT.
>
> And wasting everyone's time with irrelevant, non-responsive drivel
> about the WTC collapse don't help none, neither.
>


.

Loading