Re: this is AWESOME
- From: "dali" <borgersbrent@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Dec 2005 07:09:40 -0800
Mockingbird wrote:
> rebecca wrote:
> > I don't know what's going on here, or how things work, but if she
> > asked for counsel, it does make sense to me that the judge should rule
> > on this first before anything else. in any event, below is my favorite
> > part...
>
>
> As was stated earlier He DID rule on it. He said that he lacked
> jurisdiction. He did that a MONTH before kathLOON filed her Motion to
> dismiss defendant's motion to dismiss as a response to their motion to
> dismiss.
>
> Here it is FYI:
>
Isn't this catch-22? She claims she cannot get a fair hearing in her
state due to the fact that it's AGAINST the state. (makes sense). Yet
other states will not hear it because it will lack jurisdiction?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: this is AWESOME
- From: Yukon King
- Re: this is AWESOME
- From: Mockingbird
- Re: this is AWESOME
- From: Mockingbird
- Re: this is AWESOME
- References:
- this is AWESOME
- From: rebecca
- Re: this is AWESOME
- From: Mockingbird
- Re: this is AWESOME
- From: rebecca
- Re: this is AWESOME
- From: Mockingbird
- this is AWESOME
- Prev by Date: Re: Kathleen, take my name off your website.
- Next by Date: Re: this is AWESOME
- Previous by thread: Re: this is AWESOME
- Next by thread: Re: this is AWESOME
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|