Re: this is AWESOME
- From: "Mockingbird" <mockingbirdbrain@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Dec 2005 07:29:05 -0800
dali wrote:
> Mockingbird wrote:
> > rebecca wrote:
> > > I don't know what's going on here, or how things work, but if she
> > > asked for counsel, it does make sense to me that the judge should rule
> > > on this first before anything else. in any event, below is my favorite
> > > part...
> >
> >
> > As was stated earlier He DID rule on it. He said that he lacked
> > jurisdiction. He did that a MONTH before kathLOON filed her Motion to
> > dismiss defendant's motion to dismiss as a response to their motion to
> > dismiss.
> >
> > Here it is FYI:
> >
>
>
> Isn't this catch-22? She claims she cannot get a fair hearing in her
> state due to the fact that it's AGAINST the state. (makes sense).
And NO it does not "make sense."
People sue their own States in the courts of their states all the time
for lots of things. They sue state agencies and state officials, they
sue municipalities, state officers, local and state officials.
All the time. To the extent that their suits are NOT barred by
sovereign immunity.
>Yet
> other states will not hear it because it will lack jurisdiction?
.
- References:
- this is AWESOME
- From: rebecca
- Re: this is AWESOME
- From: Mockingbird
- Re: this is AWESOME
- From: rebecca
- Re: this is AWESOME
- From: Mockingbird
- Re: this is AWESOME
- From: dali
- this is AWESOME
- Prev by Date: Re: The Lyme Times
- Next by Date: Re: Callyme why do you enable this stuff?
- Previous by thread: Re: this is AWESOME
- Next by thread: Re: this is AWESOME
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|