Re: GAUVIN BREAKING THE LAW

It was faxed to the court and is a matter of court record 22 March
2004, ***.

Gauvin threw me in jail to avoid going to jail herself.
GET IT?

Gauvin *is* going to jail, as is Donald Dickson and Nancy Martin.

You can forward this anywhere you want, because I have
SUED THEM TWICE, ***, and the evidence is already
in evidence in BOTH FEDERAL COURTHOUSES.

End of discussion.

Kathleen
http://actionlyme.org

Mockingbird wrote:
> Forwarded to the proper authorities and archived.
>
>
> Newsgroup Leader Kathleen ActionLyme wrote:
> > Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
> > From: kathleen.***...@xxxxxxxx (Kathleen)
> > Newsgroups:
> > sci.med.diseases.lyme,alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.flame.psychiatry,alt.support.autism
> > Subject: Breaking the Law
> > Date: 22 Mar 2004 11:44:40 -0800
> > Organization: http://groups.google.com
> > Lines: 1112
> > Message-ID: <f46dbd96.0403221144.512c9175@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > References: <f46dbd96.0403210505.610670f9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > <f46dbd96.0403211406.39af8030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > <f46dbd96.0403212212.59e34217@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.60.216.215
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> > X-Trace: posting.google.com 1079984681 24828 127.0.0.1 (22 Mar 2004
> > 19:44:41 GMT)
> > X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
> > NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:44:41 +0000 (UTC)
> >
> > From: derdrittemann (derdrittemann2...@xxxxxxxxx)
> > Subject: Re: DA DCF on the WEB, NAME UP
> >
> > View this article only
> > Newsgroups: sci.med.diseases.lyme
> > Date: 2004-03-22 05:50:56 PST
> >
> > chuckpad...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Chuck P Adams) wrote in message
> > news:<20040321174402.28903.00000143@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
> > > >kathleen.***...@xxxxxxxx (Kathleen) wrote in message
> > > >> "I hope no Vigilante Justice happens, just because the DCF was
> > > >> pissed at me, and gave my kids to a known Child Abuser,
> > > >> and truly sicko sociopath...
> > >
> > >
> > > "She has gone too far now".
> >
> > Almost looks like she wants the law in her face. Like she's baiting
> > them...daring them.
> >
> > That way...she can claim that it was "political" and she is some kinda
> > freakin' holy martyr.
> >
> > Totally twisted.
> >
> > At the same time, she seems totally oblivious to how well she is
> > demonstrating for everyone her instability and propensity to reach for
> > violent solutions.
> >
> > This is the way...(in case anyone is wondering)...to lose your case.
> >
> > Post a follow-up to this message
> > ===============
> >
> > It is the DCF who broke the law, and placed my kids with a known
> > maniac. I cannot be sued for slander. I am faxing Don's Abuse
> > Records
> > all over the planet, and the links are LIVE here:
> >
> > http://www.actionlyme.com/DIRTY_DCF_DETAILS.htm
> >
> > Please discover who broke the law. Don Dickson is a sick-minded
> > abuser, a sociopath, can't keep his pants on, he stinks, and the
> > kids can't stand him. They also know he lied his face off to the DCF
> > and I have that on tape.
> >
> > DCF is throwing out petition one, and petition two is based on the
> > exact opposite of my complaints to the CHRO. 100% perjury in the
> > kourtroom, with the one exception that I was Phillips patient for
> > child
> > abuse, and that it was Carokyn Martin cannot be denied, since it is
> > in the start of both sets of notes, from 1980 and 2000. Then we
> > found
> > out it was Carolyn Martin who invented the "throat-slitting" business
> > and a bunch of other nonsense. So, for the whole world to see,
> > Carolyn
> > Martin and her retarded daughter Nancy Martin are responsible for
> > my children now being with a totally insane, alcohol and
> > drugs-demented
> > psychopath.
> >
> > And none of this is slander.
> >
> > And to continue. I hope and pray that somehow Don Dickson
> > becomes no longer a mortal, only I hope it happens when the
> > kids are not around him, or in the car with him, because Don Dickson
> > is known to have ROAD RAGE and absense seizures, from all the
> > brain damage, which I saw myself on his brain MRI. He has at
> > least 15 focal points of brain damage (ministrokes).
> >
> > And none of that is slander. I have not broken the law. Gauvin
> > violated FEDERAL STATUTES and STATE STATUTES of all kinds
> > and I am faxing what she did, all over America, since the DCF is
> > the Reverse of a Child Protection Agency.
> >
> > MARCH 17, 2004
> > Katheen Dickson K09-CP-02-008723
> >
> > MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW/HEARING
> >
> > Re: Lara, Diane, and David Dickson
> >
> > I would like to request that we review the following procedures and
> > conduct of the Department of Children and Families, and related
> > conditions of the children's kidnapping, quality of "evidence",
> > procedures in handling false allegations, the nature of the "witness"
> > testimony, the conditions of unsubstantiated allegations, the
> > significance of changing, or "amending" "petitions", and the validity
> > of the documentation and testimony the "prosecutor" submitted, and
> > especially, did not submit in terms of the DCF's ability to be
> > competent to the concept of what is in the best interests of all
> > children, let alone my own.
> >
> > I. MARK WILLIAMS and then LISA McARTHUR and MAUREEN
> > AUGER-Williams unsubstantiated the allegations, so, I would like to
> > learn why I then got Lisa McArthur, as a "worker", who told me her dog
> > and grandfather died of Lyme disease. Later, the DCF all wanted to
> > know what is the outcome of untreated Lyme disease so they could have
> > a reason to kidnap my children. One DCF moron stated to the other,
> > that the kid might end up with a bad knee. McArthur's dog and
> > grandfather did not die of a bad knee, of that we can be sure. This
> > speaks to the DCF's incompetence and clearly that they defaulted on
> > the issue of what is in the best interests of children, since I gave
> > McArthur a large amount of specific information about Lyme disease and
> > the similarities to syphilis earlier, in December 2002, on the 6th.
> > McArthur is black; the untreated spirochetal infection study was
> > already conducted, on black people- the CDC's Tuskegee "Bad Blood"
> > Syphilis "experiment." Conclusion: DCF staff is too incompetent for
> > words. Syphilis kills, and congenital syphilis is a lifelong mental
> > and physical disability. McArthur had this information, in December
> > 2002, before they "petitioned" "Superior Court", and the issue at that
> > time was clearly Medical Neglect. The DCF wanted Dr. Donta's notes.
> >
> > 2. DONALD DICKSON, 'Known to be violent, dangerous, a
> > pathological liar, an alcoholic, and brain-damaged, with absence
> > seizures. The testimony, Police, Battered Women's Shelter, courts,
> > and documentation of myself, the children, and Nancy Martin, which the
> > DCF was in receipt of, demonstrates that the DCF knows that Donald
> > Dickson is dangerous and out of control.. Donald Dickson was
> > diagnosed as a Sociopath, and this is the one single "diagnosis" which
> > has any predictive value. I was told this about Donald Dickson,
> > specifically, by David Ruffner, MD, and was given a book entitled
> > "SOCIOPATHY" by Ruffner. My supposition was that Ruffner intended for
> > me to read it. Ruffner's notes, I signed over to the DCF. Don
> > Dickson filed false allegations, lied to support enforcement Judge,
> > was arrested for domestic violence. Don Dickson's known violence and
> > abuse history was ignored. This double standard of the DCF's qualifies
> > their competency in determining what is in the best interests of
> > children, across the board. The DCF has entirely defaulted their
> > entire commission, by the example of this one "case" alone.
> >
> > 3. NANCY MARTIN- Perjury, false allegations, slander ("Family
> > Buzz") Why was this not prosecuted, since false allegations carry a
> > specific penalty?
> > "Nearly flew out the window." I think it was clear she was
> > exaggerating in her testimony. Nancy Martin wrote my father's eulogy,
> > and for the court, eulogies are supposed to be about the deceased.
> > And for the court, the deceased was my father also, and therefore
> > allowing the eulogy to be such a disaster was hardly Nancy Martin's
> > fault alone, and that is closer to the reality of tone of the
> > conversation in the car. That is, we were on our way to put this man
> > into the ground, and I, as inarguably his favorite, did not even think
> > about a eulogy. One would have to be a complete moron to think I
> > would blame Nancy 100% for this failure to create an appropriate
> > eulogy, but then, was that not what we saw in Nancy Martin? False
> > allegations; Petition One, largely written by Nancy Martin;
> > unsubstantiated, and then completely abandoned by the DCF. And where
> > is Nancy Martin's website, or history of volunteerism, or
> > publications?
> >
> > Nancy Martin is thought-disordered. Nancy Martin is
> > thought-disordered, clearly a liar, and imagine how difficult that is
> > for an autistic person, who processes speech in the opposite
> > hemisphere- in the visual cortex- to listen to?. This same condition
> > applies for Carolyn Martin. Thought disorder compounded by chronic
> > insane, bizarre, lying.
> >
> > Phillips is aware of my Autism and verbal processing condition, and
> > stated for the court, that I am like the Unibomber. The
> > characteristics of the Unibomber are not the same as someone who has
> > Borderline Personality Disorder- they are the opposite. Borderlines
> > are dramatic, aggressive individuals, who are pathological liars and
> > have a lifelong history of being physically violent towards others.
> > They chronically seek attention and are "in your face" all the time,
> > and no one wants these "patients", if one is a therapist. In fact,
> > therapists of Borderlines have to have psychotherapy, in order to be
> > able to even deal with them, and chronically write apologetic letters
> > to each other, seeking understanding from other therapists, because
> > these patients are so difficult. We can see from Phillips' notes,
> > that I do not like to talk, and he has to continue to encourage me
> > even to show up, and we heard I was never violent to anyone in my
> > whole life, and anyone has YET to prove I ever lied about anything,
> > although Gauvin tried as regards Willie Coleman, and it was in fact,
> > Gauvin who lied to the court in numerous instances, and chronically
> > lied to the lawyers in the "case status conferences". I had to hear
> > about it every time my lawyer took a break.
> > "YOU did THIS? You did THAT?"
> > "NO, Peter, she is lying to you AGAIN."
> >
> > This insane and bizarre lying of Gauvin's, is why I make it public
> > knowledge, that anyone who tangles with these DCF Psychos NEVER not
> > attend a "case status conference", in person, no matter what, and this
> > is why I declare that Gauvin, may have Borderline Personality
> > Disorder, and request a background check to see if she has a physical
> > violence history. Nancy Martin does not have a physical violence
> > history. Carolyn Martin, however, has an extensive, and extremely
> > physically violent history, towards children. This is not in dispute,
> > since I was James Phillips' patient for child abuse, and reported
> > Carolyn Martin to the DCF and James Phillips for being violent to my
> > children, although I do NOT make the claim, that she was the most
> > physically violent towards myself, among her own children, as
> > erroneously recorded in Phillips' notes; I make the claim that she was
> > the LEAST physically violent towards me, among her children. It was
> > the other types of aggression, the chronic pathological lying and the
> > IN MY FACE RAGE, that was unique to her abuse of me.
> > Now this is not in dispute, Carolyn Martin's chronic pathological
> > lying, since we are throwing out the "throat-slitting" allegations,
> > since she admitted this was her own invention, at the depositions, and
> > the DCF is throwing out this Petition Number One.
> >
> > DCF did not investigate my allegations of Carolyn Martin's insanity
> > and abuse of my children, which was one of the reasons why I reported
> > the DCF to the Commission on Human Rights (see Petition 2, the list of
> > Gauvin's)
> >
> > Competency of the DCF Issue: If I am a patient of James Phillips' for
> > Child Abuse, why were not my claims of abuse by Carolyn Martin, not
> > investigated.
> >
> > Competency Issue of the DCF: If the mission of the DCF is to prevent
> > Child Abuse, so that children become productive members of society,
> > why do they prosecute NON-Child Abusing parents, who are victims of
> > child abuse, rather than use that as a model for parenthood? The
> > non-propagation of intergenerational abuse?
> > This happens to be the model for the Department of Health and Human
> > Services for successful parenting, and identifying a parent less at
> > risk of abusing their children.
> >
> > They DHHS States that parents who are intelligent, will predictably
> > assert their anger at the appropriate targets. I make the claim that
> > the DCF blew me off in 1996, when I asked for assistance because of my
> > physical disability. I asked everyone for help.
> >
> > Then I did activism to assure Lyme disease is recognized as a valid
> > disability, WITHOUT ANYONE'S HELP, and I am criticized for doing this
> > by the very same people who I asked for help, with the children,
> > because of this same disability, who denied me every time.
> >
> > Arise, then, the questions, What is insanity, and Who is guilty of it,
> > in this little "DCF and the Activist" arena of the now infamous
> > Dickson family?
> >
> > Competency of Leebens, .Marcus, and Phillips (Yale Adult and Pediatric
> > Psychiatry and the DMHAS): Is positive reinforcement not a therapy
> > technique for adults and children? Or does that only selectively
> > apply?
> >
> > Is this the following, DCF POLICY: Punish the non-child abusing
> > parent, by traumatizing the children with a kidnapping right before
> > the holidays (assuring unhappy holidays for the rest of their lives),
> > and reward child-abusing parents, such as Donald Dickson and Carolyn
> > Martin, by not only placing the children with the abusive parent,
> > Donald Dickson, and then not prosecuting Carolyn Martin (and Nancy
> > Martin), when she is clearly insane and now in the care of yet another
> > child?
> >
> > This concept stands in refute of DHHS policy, from which DCF is
> > commissioned to adhere, or they could lose their funding.
> >
> > What then is the platform for any psychotherapy or argument for Child
> > Protection? Is this Yale's platform also? We already know the DMHAS
> > and DCF abuses so-called mentally ill children and adults, and this is
> > reported almost daily in the newspapers, and if it is not seen as a
> > national disgrace than we have as big a problem with George W. Bush
> > starting wars over the very same Human Rights Abuses in Iraq, now,
> > allegedly, here in Connecticut. "The Constitution State".
> >
> > "We are Americans and we assert Liberty to be for all, but only
> > according to our own standards for other peoples, and we have a double
> > standard, and ''That'll be fine', because whoever is not with us is
> > against us."
> >
> >
> > Similarly, Nancy Martin, who has zero history for activism, or
> > volunteerism, or anything scholarly or scientific, or helping anyone
> > in the family (particularly the one who needs it the most, my younger
> > sister), yet has declared me an "irresponsible" parent, invaded my
> > medical privacy without authorization, reported falsely the condition
> > of my children, Nancy is known to be thought-disordered, yet in
> > advisorship of chronically ill people, like Lyme patients; and has
> > attended Lyme conferences with me, "So I could help her", yet she
> > never reported to the DCF that I was sick. I can't come up with a
> > stronger word than moron. I do indeed, and in truth, pity Nancy
> > Martin. 'Moreso, however, the people who pay her, her "clients."
> >
> > We have since learned that High Functioning Autistic people are
> > "difficult and isolative", and that would be precisely because we
> > process speech in the opposite hemisphere, and require data to be
> > physically factual and relevant to the topic being discussed, because
> > there is simply no other way we can process information. This was
> > what I meant when I said to the Judge, "You can't cure autism."
> >
> > I yelled at Nancy Martin in the hospital- See Phillips' notes. Nancy
> > started crying, because I told her my brother Paul, and sister
> > MaryJane and I were sick of Nancy's requalifying everything anyone
> > said in the hospital. No one wanted it, or needed it. We hope she
> > does not have this little respect for her "clients." Nancy Martin
> > later reported this incident as my yelling at Carolyn Martin. Carolyn
> > Martin had left the room, and was standing in the hallway. Nancy
> > Martin's education does not reflect her ability to assess much of what
> > anyone has to say, much less someone with a degree in science and who
> > worked for a pharmaceutical company. Nancy Martin literally said I
> > was an "irresponsible" parent because, "Well, she goes to the
> > library," at the depositions.
> >
> > These are my critics. Phillips knows all about this condition. He
> > was furious also because of all the true statements I made about him
> > on the web, but I cannot be sued for slander. He also should not have
> > tried to do psychotherapy, since that is not recommended for autistic
> > people for this very reason of lacking the ability to process people
> > differently than objects. He specifically told me, the incident of
> > copying my siblings' speech, in order to experiment with "making her
> > work" (Carolyn Martin), was autism (age 3 or 4). It is said that
> > Autistic people are not aware that language is used for communicating.
> >
> >
> > This incident (May, 2002, see Phillips' notes) "Nancy Martin explains
> > things at the hospital, regardless of whether it had to do with
> > medical issues, reality, or our interactions" all happened after the
> > Lyme vaccine came off the market (Feb 2002), which was a considerable
> > success for our activism and side of the "controversy" (Lyme/RICO),
> > particularly since I was the one who lead the national campaign to get
> > adverse events reported, went down to Bethesda and told the FDA that
> > the vaccine was a fraud, and this indeed got the attention of the FDA
> > vaccine committee. My father said of the vaccine's withdrawal from
> > the market, "Keep doing what you are doing." The issue in the family
> > was my failure to get Social Security disability because my IQ was too
> > high, but I was disabled. Therefore, my family invented that I was
> > insane, and invented all the things I allegedly did. And continue to
> > do, and over the years, apparently in sharing these imaginary
> > incidents with the extended family, which they have a decades-long
> > history of doing.
> >
> > I realise none of that makes any sense, but now the court and my
> > children must suffer the torture of the Martin family insanity, but
> > not as a result of anything I did or said.
> >
> > Nancy Martin did not attend the Vossler family reunion, Sep 15, 2002,
> > because "things did not go her way." Nancy is a Marriage and Family
> > Therapist, is on her third husband, and has no children. I hope I
> > don't have to spell out what level of expertise she has in Marriage
> > and Family matters for the court.
> >
> > Attempts to get help from the State, Tom Ryan, and the OPAPD. Not
> > eligible.
> >
> > Nancy Martins letters (emails) to Rebecca, discussing Diane and David,
> > who became Becky's victims (of alse statements, like "DAVID BROKE MY
> > COMPUTER!!!!" (Dave picked up the phone when Becky was online)
> > We later learned that Rebecca had a lifelong learning disability from
> > the Neurofibromatosis, as her mother had, but no one helped her,
> > particularly Nancy Martin, who is a Marriage and Family Therapist, and
> > who knew more about the situation down there than I did (Martin
> > Schade's behaviors, the trouble with the autistic child, it all being
> > too much for MaryJane who is learning disabled), since she was down in
> > Milford every Friday, visiting Grandma, discussing Nancy Martin's
> > Important Life, as was tradition.
> >
> > 4. CAROLYN MARTIN - 'False allegations, same as Nancy
> > Martin
> > (Evidence: Phillips Notes, Letters from family, testimony of Family
> > Members, James Vossler: "180 degrees different" than Nancy Martin.
> > Kathleen was a scholar and an athlete. Books and Sports)
> > 'A lifetime of lying about me, because I was my father's favorite,
> > and
> > I was JUST LIKE HIM (Phillips records, pages New and Old)
> >
> > 'Went around telling everyone Diane and I were not sick, we were just
> > stupid, lazy, clumsy and careless, and that Diane was "JUST LIKE HER
> > MOTHER!!!". She told relatives this right in front of Diane, while
> > Diane was in the car riding with these relatives, and were discussing
> > these criticisms of me, right in front of my daughter. Carolyn
> > Martin later physically attacked my daughter, Diane (and David, I
> > later learned), screamed at her and shook her, and told her she was
> > just like her mother. (~Dec 5, 2002)
> >
> > Carolyn Martin at the depositions: Someone-said-I-said, "Kathleen
> > Dickson would kill herself if Don ever got the kids."
> >
> > 'Would not let me take the kids home, April 2002.
> > Carolyn Martin's violent, and explosive behaviors, and guttural,
> > random utterances, all the screaming and fighting at her house in the
> > Spring of 2002, was not a good condition, and should have been
> > Phillips' place to put an end to it, for the safety and health of all
> > of us. I have a neurological disease, and my father was aged and had
> > Parkinson's. He was also autistic and could not handle all the
> > screaming. Rebecca, my niece, literally practices being the loudest
> > screamer in the neighborhood. Carolyn Martin, knowing how much this
> > annoyed her husband, did not try to put a stop to it, for the benefit
> > of sanity, peace, and health.
> > John Martin hated the screaming when we were kids, and Nancy was
> > always known as The Screamer. Nancy got squat in his will. This must
> > have hurt her feelings, and we all had known about the will for
> > perhaps two decades, yet "WILL", the concept, clearly never entered
> > her mind. But it is also true, that "no one else wanted" my father's
> > books, so, I was told I "could have them."
> >
> > Carolyn Martin said if I took the kids back home she would call the
> > DCF on me in April 2002. About a month later my father had a stroke,
> > and it was MY fault (Nancy Martin's Sept 2002 letter). If you ask me,
> > if it were not for the DCF, and the delight Carolyn Martin takes in
> > abusing me, my father might still be alive. Everyone was fond of him,
> > except for Rebecca, because he did not approve of her behaviors,
> > which, maybe they were due to her disability, but would it not be
> > someone's responsibility besides mine to get this kid help? (See the
> > Nov 16 databinders, It was I who helped this kid with school and not
> > Nancy Martin, the Marriage and Family Therapist, who instead reported
> > to the DCF that I was responsible for this kids bad grades, when she
> > had always had bad grades, and was reading at the mid third grade
> > level in 6th grade, so it is not even her MOTHER's fault. The school
> > is not exactly guilt-free for promoting her, and putting her in that
> > anxiety-producing environment.)
> >
> > Perhaps I should draw the conclusion here, since DCF staff will be
> > reading this: It is better to "DO", than to talk about "DO", or "AM",
> > and "DO" or "AM", is better done, if one is educated, and then the
> > "DO" and "AM", could be something valuable to others, if the doer so
> > chooses. For example, Analytical Chemistry and Human/Patient Rights
> > Activism.
> >
> >
> > 5. STONINGTON SCHOOLS - Perjury. See History in Nov 16
> > databinders.
> > 'Extreme contentiousness.
> > I tried to neutralize this; Mrs. Jordan, David's Principal, did not
> > testify. She was the one I was having an argument with, but she did
> > not testify, the person outside did.
> > 'Diane's COGNITIVE Evals, which showed these deficits beyond doubt.
> >
> > 'Don Dickson stating that I should be helping Diane more, but that
> > was
> > written into her 504 plan, specifically, and yet still the schools did
> > not follow 504 plan. We learned Diane even has a hard time with
> > homework, and may at this point, not have any, which was a condition
> > of the original 504 plan, speaking to how ignorant Don Dickson was of
> > his children's welfare and educational, as well as medical, status.
> > Don Dickson told the DCF Diane had personality problems (is crazy).
> > Later, once the children became victims of his private captivity
> > (sociopathy), after the children were illegitimately kidnapped by the
> > DCF, Don Dickson told Diane and David there was "something wrong with
> > their brains," because they could not do math as well as he could.
> >
> >
> > 6. JAMES PHILLIPS- 'Records incomplete, There were two
> > hospitalizations; no threats of suicide, which is a characteristic of
> > Borderline Personality Disorder. All the Hall-Brooke notes are
> > missing from Hall-Brooke. I was last his patient in 1985, not 1982,
> > and he remembered it being 1985. 'Notes from Hall-brooke that we
> > have, reflect more of Carolyn Martin's false statements, so this is a
> > continuous pattern for Carolyn Martin.
> > False are also, the records of emails that I sent him. He had at
> > least 4 inches of documentation about Lyme Neuroborreliosis, including
> > a full copy of my first website, which went up in Nov 2000, "The Lyme
> > disease Dilemma". He sent for the court, my delirious, even more
> > psychotically depressed (in his "care") emails to him. In his notes,
> > is recorded on numerous occasions, that these CNS depressing drugs are
> > making me more depressed and delirious. 'A very bad thing to do to a
> > person in the care of children. I was not depressed around the
> > children, I was depressed around Phillips. Does it ever happen that
> > only certain people are avoided by others.
> >
> > 'Wrong medication. Notes Review: Provigil, Sep 23, 2000, requested.
> > This was for alertness, It was entered for the record of the court,
> > that I have a delirium.
> >
> > I'm not even going to annihilate him here too much because I think the
> > destruction of that relationship could be blamed on the DCF's
> > interference. I don't think he would have said, "I think you need to
> > be on medication; I just don't know what kind," if the DCF was not
> > involved.
> >
> > I think these DCF morons told my Psychiatrist his business, and they
> > ruined his reputation. However, Nancy Martin's interference with the
> > lives of people who had nothing to do with her, her unwanted moronical
> > opinion, unwanted advice, illegal access to my medical condition,
> > illegally and fraudulently revealing this condition, is more the
> > crime.
> >
> > I might even go so far as to say I was too stupid to ask, "What do you
> > mean?", when he said "I AM YOUR DOCTOR," because I asked him, "Who are
> > you/", because I am autistic and he wasn't making any sense. This is
> > meant to the humorous presentation of why one should never attempt
> > "psychotherapy" with an autistic person. Recall that I had a Capgras
> > "Psychosis" when I was a kid. Notice that I do not state, that I
> > should be denied a Psychiatrist, nor that this is a flaw. The simple
> > conclusion is, that Psychiatrists need to consider and develop their
> > role, which would be significant in the future, in being interpreters
> > for Autistic persons, because who else would we expect to become
> > qualified?
> > What did we hear from Marcus in comparison? His testimony was a
> > complete disgrace, and the lesson should be, that the DCF and DMHAS
> > should STAY THE HELL OUT OF IT. And the lesson should be the same for
> > Managed Care involvement, as well. Logic dictates that the
> > under-informed will make more errors.
> > Phillips never called the DCF ON me, he called them FOR me, as regards
> > this Respite Care. See his notes.
> >
> >
> > 7. SARAH GIBSON-Principal Attorney for the New Haven DCF.
> > Lied to the Commission on Human Rights, requiring me to report her to
> > the Statewide Bar Counsel. Gibson went way overboard with the lying,
> > and is so incompetent, she may not even be working for the DCF any
> > more. My understanding is that she has a sociology undergraduate
> > degree which is one step above the NOTHING degree of the Mail-Order
> > "General Studies" which Nancy Martin has, from the Moonies at the
> > University of Bridgeport. What she wrote and what she did is in the
> > November 16 databinders. I do not want drugs, thanks, I want physical
> > assistance for my physical disability, which is recorded multiple
> > times, by the DCF and n testimony from Phillips.
> >
> > When I explained to Gibson, in greater detail (2 inches worth of
> > scientific emails), what that physical disability was. Gibson sent it
> > to the Commission on Human Rights, as evidence of my insanity,
> > speaking to the value of a degree in Sociology. She clearly could not
> > even read it, even though she was a lawyer. Or maybe again the issue
> > is, What is the value of lying, hateful, vindictive MORONS, running
> > the DCF, to the public, when we have illness epidemics that affect the
> > brain and nervous system, and can kill people, including children, in
> > Connecticut?
> >
> > 8. GLORIA McCOMAS-Gave me a hearing, and told me she would
> > review the documents that I submitted in my substantiation hearing. I
> > told her "Baloney" essentially, and reported her to the USDOJ, for
> > Discrimination. After my website went up, the DCF dropped the hearing
> > because they knew they would lose.
> >
> > 9. LAURA LUSTIG-- 'Pretended to not be familiar with the
> > initials "D C F" when she trains DCF morons and her second in command
> > is a former DCF Commissioner, Mark Marcus. Her statements and evals
> > are clearly now invalid.
> > 'Was not supposed to know anything about my 'case": but on Nov 19,
> > when I met with her, she tried to paint a picture of paranoia, asking
> > me all sorts of questions about why I could not get my children
> > treated for Lyme disease in Connecticut.
> >
> > It is not disputed that my kids have Lyme disease, and Lyme is a brain
> > disease, but the State asserts I am just insane. The State did not
> > Romance Dr. Donta's records, which were also on my website, because
> > they knew they would not then have a case of neglect in my case. They
> > originally wanted Dr. Donta's notes. I said BALONEY, you hardly have
> > a case of Medical Neglect, it was FINE for Robert Schoen to not even
> > treat me when I was pregnant with Dave, after I had congenitally
> > infected the first two kids, with the Medical Licensing Board, and
> > essentially, what the Hell are you DCF MORONS talking about, Who could
> > be doing MORE about this Lyme situation?
> >
> > I am reporting Lustig's behavior to the USDOJ, and Blumenthal and
> > Milstein. We can reconsider what is in the best interests of the
> > children, when such testimony is fraudulent, and the State is under
> > investigation for corruption, related to Federal Contracts and all
> > kinds of contracts, which surely stink of favoritism, and friendly
> > appointments. Perhaps Lustig can also lose her contract with the
> > State.
> >
> > Clearly in this case, I made the DCF furious for making them to look
> > like the fools that they are, and "in the best intersests of children"
> > which is their obligation, you would think the DCF would consider what
> > THEY are doing wrong, rather than persecute me. If the DCF are
> > capable of such clearly biased decisions, they are incompetent to the
> > what is in the Best Interests of Children across the board,
> > particularly given Lustig's testimony in comparison to my success as a
> > Lyme disease activist
> > (What is in the best interests of children- The Lyme vaccine is off
> > the market because it was dangerous and killed 4/13 fetuses- My last
> > statement to the FDA was, "We should not approve this vaccine for use
> > in children, until we know why it is making adults so sick." WHO is
> > operating in the bests interests of children, if that dangerous
> > vaccine is gone, and my KIDS ARE NOW WITH A MANIAC, who did NOTHING
> > for them?)
> >
> > 10. PATRICIA LEEBENS-'Defrauded the court, plain and simple.
> >
> > Sec. 17a-83. (Formerly Sec. 17-205j). Penalty for conspiring to commit
> > any child to a hospital for mental illness. Any person who wilfully
> > files or attempts to file or conspires with any person to file a
> > fraudulent or malicious application, order or request for the
> > commitment, hospitalization or treatment of any child pursuant to
> > section 17a- 76, 17a-78 or 17a-79, and any person who wilfully
> > certifies falsely to the mental disorder of any child in any
> > certificate provided for in this part, and any person who, under the
> > provisions of sections 17a-75 to 17a-83, inclusive, relating to
> > mentally ill minors, wilfully reports falsely to any court or judge
> > that any child is mentally disordered, shall be fined not more than
> > one thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
> > (P.A. 79-511, S. 9; P.A. 81-472, S. 37, 159.)
> > History: P.A. 81-472 removed Sec. 17-184 from the scope of this
> > section; Sec. 17-205j transferred to Sec. 17a-83 in 1991.
> >
> > 'Did not mention to the Judge that she was looking at SPECIFIC
> > replies
> > to the Commission on Human Rights and Statewide Bar Counsel. I had to
> > establish that I was disabled in order to be considered eligible for
> > intervention by the CHRO.
> > I demonstrated that it was Donald Dickson who was the abusive and
> > negligent parent in that dataset, and also the DCF (Andersson and
> > Gibson).
> > Her Order of Kidnapping was disorganized, conflicting, and simply
> > completely fraudulent.
> >
> > It was the CONTENT of the emails and not the volume, which so
> > infuriated the DCF. Volume is not a consideration. The DCF has no
> > idea how fast I write, they only know I have three websites, and one
> > of them, ActionLyme.com, is the most comprehensive website in the
> > world on Lyme disease, and has features not seen anywhere else, such
> > as tables which allow the comparative analysis of research into Lyme
> > borreliosis, Multiple Sclerosis, Lupus, etc and in comparison to the
> > waste basket diagnoses of Chronic Fatgue Syndrome and Fibromyalgia, so
> > we can see whether they converge or diverge, and these links are LIVE
> > to MedLine. So far these disorders are clinically indistinguishable,
> > note that these waste basket diagnosed are not researched thoroughly
> > for the very reason they are waste basket diagnoses-Insurance
> > companies can pay for nothing; not treatment and not Long term
> > Disability, because, in the absence of real laboratory data, these are
> > considered a form of "crazy" and are DSM psychiatric somatoform
> > disorders. And this is deliberate. It is part and parcel of the
> > Fraud of Insurance Medicine. Fling invalid Psych terms, rather than
> > obtain objective data, then HMOs can pay for nothing. Even better,
> > don't even pay for psychotherapy for these alleged somatoform
> > diagnoses, insist on more brain and nerve damaging psychotropics,
> > until the patient either croaks or goes on MediCare.
> >
> >
> > I type and write extremely fast, and the enormous ActionLyme website
> > went up in just a few weeks, limited only by scanning-documents time,
> > because I had all that research in my head already, and knew where
> > everything I needed was, on the web. I simultaneously filed a RICO
> > complaint, which was quite complex. All this occurred from May until
> > August. Simultaneous I went after exposing the DCF to be a fraud of a
> > Child Protection Agency, and for specifically being so incompetent. I
> > learned from my communications with them, especially that Lyme is a
> > bad knee, and the DCF cited one of the crooks on Lyme, Eugene Shapiro,
> > that the DCF could not be more JUST PLAIN STUPID- It's not even
> > ignorance, since I GAVE Lisa McArthur the Neurological data on Lyme.
> > I would have to say, seeing that arthritis reference alone, in their
> > notes, slew me.
> > I set out to hammer then, the entire State-that is, expose to the
> > whole world that this was the problem with Lyme disease, after all-
> > The State of Connecticut's position on Lyme and their direct and
> > specific liabilities, particularly as related to Yale University and
> > John G. Rowland of the Insurance Capital.
> >
> > If I filed a RICO complaint, and that dangerous Lyme vaccine came off
> > the market, who in the DCF has accomplished similar vectors on behalf
> > of not only children but adults in this State, therefore how is anyone
> > associated with the DCF competent to assess what is in the Best
> > Interests of ANYONE's children, let alone my own, if my particular
> > case demonstrates the treatment of a Human Rights Activist and Patient
> > Rights Actvist Parent?
> >
> > Was anyone here to see how fast I type? Were the children not
> > adequately cared for during the time I built this website and filed
> > the RICO complaint? That is because I do this work, in the early
> > morning hours, before the kids even get out of bed. That is because I
> > am autistic, and I "can't shut my brain off", because that is the
> > nature of high functioning autism / savantism. Very Superior Visual
> > Spatial Abilities in a scientist female, only happens in autism, and
> > therefore no one is qualified to assess me. Having Leebens, Marcus or
> > Phillips assess me would be like asking a 4 year old to correct the
> > final exam of a college student taking Physical Chemistry. They
> > simply do not even know my language, and their opinions have no basis
> > in scientific fact. What they do is all conjecture, subjective, and
> > as we have seen, changes to suit their needs
> >
> > 'Phillips' multiple diagnoses, depending on who he is talking to,
> > Marcus: I am so psychotic, I don't know how psychotic I am? Leebens,
> > just plain lied, and did not mention that I listed my disabilities
> > because I had to, to be eligible for CHRO intervention. How often
> > does she do that? Was that a function of her stupidity? Does Yale
> > Child Study know she is capable of such behavior, whether it is
> > legitimate or illegitimate? Would Yale be happy this is the
> > reputation of competency that Leebens demonstrates?
> >
> > Were what she did to become public knowledge, would that not be
> > something Yale would be very unhappy with? Would any parent bring
> > their child to Yale for anything, if they knew they might be similarly
> > fraudulently assessed?
> >
> > What's more important to do, keep a roof over our heads, or watch
> > Oprah Winfrey or the soaps?
> > What, in the mind of a DCF MORON, should I otherwise have been doing
> > with my time, given the fact that we were so at risk of losing
> > Disability income, because "Lyme disease" was spun?
> >
> > NOW my disability records are in the possession of the DCF, yet Gauvin
> > still claims I am nearly 100% insane. In the face of a website, that
> > reaches across the world, and in the face of the documents from
> > Customs, the USDOJ, the DHHS, scanned into my website, Gauvin would
> > dare say to the court that I am psychotic nearly 100% of the time?
> >
> > I seriously and sincerely believe that Gauvin needs to be locked up in
> > a padded cell because that clearly means she is insane and dangerous
> > to others.
> >
> > Compare what I do for the general population, in terms of what is in
> > the best interests of children, compared to what the DCF has done,
> > just in my particular "case". DCF prosecutes me for this behavior,
> > for this activism, for this donated time, and web fees, they declare
> > it to be insanity, and yet Gauvin could bring no expert scientist, to
> > say anything other than I am psychotic, and specifically "Don't look
> > at the content," to the Judge, which is not only the funniest thing I
> > have ever heard, but an insult to the court, to the Judge's
> > intelligence, and demonstrates a lack of competency by top level DCF
> > and DMHAS staff, and therefore they default their entire commissions,
> > in terms of What is in the Best Interests of Children.
> >
> > I knew ahead of time this would happen. I was hoping I would be going
> > face to face with one of the people I named in the RICO complaint. I
> > had all my documents ready to fire back, at say, the likes of Eugene
> > Shapiro. But Shapiro wouldn't dare, in fact, show up and try to tell
> > me I am wrong, because it would be YALE's published documents, that
> > we, the Respondents, would place in his hands and say,
> >
> > "WHAT DOES THIS MEAN, DR. SHAPIRO? IS THIS A PUBLICATION BY YALE
> > PATHOLOGY THAT STATES THAT THIS NEWBORN DIED OF THE CONGENITAL BRAIN
> > INFECTION BY THE LYME SPIROCHETE?, AND DIDN'T YOU PUBLISH, DR.
> > SHAPIRO, LATER, THAT THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN?"
> >
> >
> > 11. KENNETH MARCUS- 'Same category as Leebens. 'Worse than
> > useless. 'Clearly frightened of the concept and the fact that
> > psychotropics are brain damaging. 'Perjured himself as regards the
> > relative treatment of a delirium vs a psychosis. Even an entity as
> > ignorant as the DCF may think twice about using him again as a
> > witness, because he was clearly confused.
> >
> > He was also clearly excited by the whole affair, which again brings to
> > mind the question of, What attracts certain people to this business,
> > "Psychiatry", in the first place?
> >
> >
> > 12. CHARLES KINARD-'Incompetent. 'A liar. "Our beloved
> > agency" Beloved to whom? Everyone hates the DCF, and it is common
> > knowledge that they are abusive, incompetent morons. This statement
> > belies the fact that they can't even acknowledge their mission in
> > servitude to the public.
> >
> > Kinard executed the same lie the DCF "lawyer" Sarah Gibson executed.
> > The DCF has no knowledge of my being ill, only insane. There simply
> > aren't enough agencies to report all these DCF morons to. Who am I
> > going to report Kinard to, why even bother any more? Not a single one
> > of them is competent to anything, that I have yet run across. Not
> > Psychiatric Care and not Medical Care, Not Physical Care: The Scruggs
> > case, and my case, where we both were disabled, in one way or another
> > as regards the physical care of children. I thought I should be doing
> > more to assure the fights did not escalate, Mrs. Scruggs was clearly
> > too depressed to even see what she was doing, and of course, the
> > female population of the planet Earth was wondering "WHERE IS THIS
> > BOY'S FATHER, to help out the mother with the two jobs?"
> > And if the Scruggs boy had Autism, where did he GET it from? THE
> > MOTHER ???
> > Autism is more often orderliness, when not confused by other peoples'
> > stupid opinion. Did anyone test Mrs. Scruggs IQ? Did anyone venture
> > a medical problem in HER case? Her house was a mess and the kid was a
> > mess and the house stunk.
> > The last people on Earth who are competent to assess the needs of
> > Children and Families, is clearly the CT DCF. What would it have
> > taken to spend 40 bucks a week on this family to send out a
> > housecleaning company, if the mother could not keep up. At least to
> > boy would have had clean clothes and a bath TWICE a week. What if the
> > mother just needed someone to show they cared, if she too was
> > autistic, or depressed, and a social outcast for such?
> >
> > WHY is it SO DIFFICULT to see through the eyes of the victim, and in
> > this case supposedly children?
> >
> > "Our Beloved Agency", says Kinard, and is an inkling as to why the DCF
> > is so incompetent. "Play for Pay" (For the unitiated into DCF
> > PsychoLand- that could be translated into SLUTS for the Rowlandgate
> > State).
> >
> > One would have every reason to believe the DCF hiring process screens
> > in incompetent, lying morons, and no other class of people are
> > eligible. It could even be a case of reverse discrimination. They
> > don't hire decent people. I have no reason to believe this would not
> > be a legitimate Civil Rights Discrimination Complaint to the USDOJ.
> >
> > Every last one of them should be fired, to get rid of this insidious
> > hatred, and selfish mentality. Start over.
> >
> > It is truly sickening to me, to see Marcus request extra security from
> > the public, JUST LIKE THE DCF's, and that that would be a bill we all
> > could read. Worse, that anyone would approve of their intended
> > ongoing abuse of the public, such that they should have extra
> > protection against the public. What's the next step? They all just
> > carry guns and we forget entirely the DCF Kangaroo Kourt Trials, with
> > the 100% Perjury?
> >
> > That is, in fact, what Donald Dickson told my son last year. "The DCF
> > can just walk in and KILL you if they want."
> >
> >
> > 13. JESSICA CICHON-A total idiot. She said it was okay that
> > Don Dickson shoved David down three flights of outside stairs, AHEAD
> > OF HIM, because Dave did not have a mark on his shoulder, 10 months
> > later. Because other DCF idiots will be reading this, I will explain
> > some common sense and OSHA things: The kid could have fallen down the
> > stairs and been killed.
> >
> >
> > 14. AD LITEM, PRISCILLA HAMMOND- Interesting person. 'Lied
> > to
> > my face and made David feel terrible. She said, "We thought WE were
> > Lyme activists!"
> > Hammond is a lawyer from Lyme, and is on the Board of Education in
> > Lyme CT, where we have so much trouble with students who have Lyme.
> > Primarily, that could be because Lyme School system has Vijay Sikand
> > as their Medical Director, and Sikand is responsible for not reporting
> > adverse evens as regards the Lyme vaccine in the trial, for which he
> > was an administrator. As a result, that dangerous Lyme vaccine came
> > on the market and then off again, because of the adverse events, that
> > should have been reported in the first place, and would have prevented
> > this vaccine's FDA "approval".
> >
> > The Belgian SmithKline reps were sitting right behind us in the FDA
> > meeting in Bethesda, whispering about him in French.
> >
> >
> > 15. JESSICA GAUVIN- Besides already being known to be 100% a
> > kook, she stated that Paul Chill, her instructor in law school, was
> > "brilliant" but is "on the other side". So, for normal people, that
> > means Intelligent Life would have nothing to do with the DCF, and see
> > them to be generally in the wrong.
> >
> > Here would be my question for the Administrative Review Hearing.
> >
> > If we are throwing out Petition One, and Petition Two and the Order of
> > Kidnapping was based on "NO EVIDENCE" and the DCF are known by all to
> > be morons, and if my kids have Lyme, but I am being accused by Gauvin
> > of being psychotic 100% of the time, but I am also being accused of
> > being a "very intelligent" "chemist", but also insane to be filing a
> > RICO complaint, and yet Gauvin did not bring the testimony of one
> > single scientist, and I am known to be a pharmaceutical chemist, and
> > that I was involved in the Lyme vaccine coming off the market,
> > specifically because I demonstrated to the FDA that the qualification
> > of the Lyme vaccine was fraudulent, (which would lead a normal-minded
> > person to think that the current blood testing for Lyme disease is
> > fraudulent), and Gauvin creates a list of my communications to the
> > CHRO, Statewide Bar Counsel, and communications copied to Mr.
> > Blumenthal as regards the Lyme/RICO, but she does not turn these over
> > to the court, and instead she has Marcus come down and just talk about
> > emails, which make reference to the Lyme RICO, and the DCF being
> > morons, and Rowland needing to be impeached, and then we find out
> > Rowland will be impeached, and he has relationships with other known
> > crooks like Peter Ellef and Lawrence Alibozek, who both worked for
> > CIGNA, and TREA is a real thing only because I read it in the
> > newspaper, and the Lyme RICO just MIGHT involve insurance companies,
> > who just MIGHT be happy that the Lyme blood testing misses most of the
> > cases, my question for the Review Hearing would be,
> >
> > "How stupid does Gauvin think the Judge is?"
> >
> >
> > 16. KATHLEEN HARKINS- Told me the DCF was charging me with
> > Inadequate Supervision. 'Knows all about Lyme, because she
> > prosecuted
> > one of my Lyme friends. Her father was the head of some Medical
> > Society down here in the East End, which, besides the big problem of
> > Vikay Sikand, if we have The Harkins Hateful Mentality influencing the
> > medical community, it may be less surprising that I started the first
> > support group in Southeastern CT, in December 1997. And because some
> > DCF morons may be reading this, Lyme is in southeastern CT, and Lyme
> > is the name of the town that Lyme disease was discovered in, by Lyme
> > resident Polly Murray, in 1975. So, because some DCF morons are
> > reading this, I will do the math: It took 22+ years after the
> > discovery of this international epidemic for there to be a support
> > group in this very county.
> >
> > That was meant to be a remarkable situation (for the DCF morons who
> > may be reading this.)
> >
> > 17. KAREN ANDERSSON-- 'States that there is an increasing
> > number of children with behavioral disorders that can't be taken care
> > of in the home in April 2001, as regards what looked like a LymeRage
> > Child [see the Nov 16 databinders, entered as evidence, and my
> > communications (or "inadequacy" thereof)] and then is interviewed by
> > the Hartford Courant and discusses such behavioral disorders, but can
> > only come up with a genetic example, Fragile X, which is not an
> > epidemic, and would be expected to be rather on the decrease, with the
> > advent of genetic screening and counseling.
> >
> > 'Was asked to be a consultant in my "case". Why wasn't she? That
> > would be because of the extensive communications with her, about the
> > brain effects of "LYME DISEASE CHILDREN" which were prior to the March
> > 29, 2003 cutoff date, as recorded by Leebens in the Order of
> > Kidnapping. And of course, March 2003, was when I got a look finally
> > at what these morons were saying to each other, when Congressman
> > Simmons assisted me, because they would not turn over their "records"
> > to me.
> >
> > And then I also discovered that DCF's Mark Williams had told me to
> > confront the people who were harassing me, because I read about it.
> >
> > Autistic people take things literally. Then my website went up. And
> > none of it is slander, because not only do we take things literally,
> > we are literal, tend to be scientists, and prefer to deal with "the
> > facts and not people" (-Phillips notes, page 47, bottom). My having
> > dealt with the DCF reinforces the sensibility of that statement, but
> > also the validity of the Lyme RICO, and which comes from a
> > pharmaceutical chemist, who is familiar with what FDA considers to be
> > criteria for a validly efficacious product. LymeRIX was not one of
> > them.
> >
> >
> > 18. KRISTINE RAGAGLIA-Already in trouble with the US Attorney
> > Nora Dannehy. it appears, for hanging out with the Kidnapping for
> > Federal Millions, TREA (Tomasso, Rowland, Ellef, and Alibozek)
> > Company.
> >
> > 'Sent me a form and stated that I had to reply to it within 20 days
> > (regarding the Substantiation Hearing), and then held it 15 days. It
> > was postmarked 15 days after the date it was supposedly written. So,
> > I had, like One day to reply and have it postmarked in time.
> >
> >
> > 19. THE ISSUE OF MY CHILDREN BEING AWARE OF WHAT TOTALLY LYING
> > MORONS THE DCF STAFF ARE.
> > My children read the DCF's lying records, and they read the Statements
> > of Nancy Martin and Donald Dickson, and my children read whatever they
> > wanted to read. My children read. My children are educated and are
> > the children of a scientist and Human Rights are ActionLyme's
> > platform, and have been, ever since I started the group, in the Summer
> > of 1999.
> >
> > The children were not raised by Donald Dickson and they were
> > "Wonderful" children. Because the Ad Litem did not pick up on this,
> > perhaps the other DCF morons did not either. The Ad Litem also said
> > these were sweet kids, and I had to explain to her the connection.
> >
> > Sweet, Wonderful kids that I raised à "The nut never falls far from
> > the tree."
> > "You can Judge a tree by its fruit" Is that enough?
> >
> > See the November 16 databinders for yet another objective opinion of
> > my kids, by my Aunt Jane, who is not Aunt Jeane, who we heard from in
> > court. Aunt Jane has a Masters in Education and was a school teacher.
> >
> > "These are EXTREMELY WELL-CARED-FOR looking children, so no one better
> > be thinking neglect. ..." Sept 15, 2002
> >
> > I did not hear about this "Family Buzz" Nancy Martin created until
> > October 2002, or even that there was one.
> > I have extremely excellent children, and I am sick, and I did it
> > myself, with no help, even though I asked, and the Lyme vaccine came
> > off the market, and I am an irresponsible parent, because I go to the
> > library, says Nancy Martin the total pinhead.
> >
> > And that is also the problem I have with the Ad Litem. Who is she to
> > judge what I do? Who is anyone to judge what I do, and the most
> > obvious question is, can the State bring one single person, who
> > matches my qualifications, training, and effort on behalf of others,...
> > Can the State find another person who has done what I have done, and
> > WHAT are the grounds for doing so in the first place if the kids are
> > fine?
> >
> >
> >
> > My children were not kept from reading what I did not want the
> > children to read, as someone stated (I think the Ad Litem) for the
> > very reason that there is nothing in the DCF's records that is true
> > about me, that is a derogatory statement. In fact, that is why I
> > asked them if they wanted to read the DCF morons' notes to each other
> > and the things their father said about me, and about them, the
> > children.
> >
> > I could frame this concept and argument slightly differently and say
> > the DCF morons did not want my children to discover what morons the
> > DCF staff are, and invented that I only let the kids see what I wanted
> > them to see, but that ought to be obvious.
> > What else could they say?
> >
> > I never forced my kids to read anything. How can anyone force a kid
> > to read anything, especially something as objectionable and deranged
> > as the DCF's notes. The kids thought it especially noteworthy what
> > their father said about them. That is, when the read it, they either
> > were in shock and were crying, or they were just very sad and were
> > crying. They also knew the allegations of Nancy Martin were totally
> > false, because they were THERE when these things never happened. DCF
> > threw out this Petition One, largely the invention of Nancy Martin,
> > and the most serious allegations were unsubstantiated.
> >
> >
> > I have the children on tape, now, saying they never told their father
> > that I beat their butts until they are red, or that I threatened to
> > drive them into a lake, or that they were ever afraid to drive with
> > me. In fact. Nancy Martin wrote to the DCF that the children told her
> > they were afraid to drive with Don, in Sep 2002.
> >
> > The DCF threw out Petition One, and Petition Two was not written, nor
> > did I even see it, until November 12- 21, right before the kidnapping,
> > and Petition Two made no sense. I encourage the DCF's related morons,
> > such as all State-hired psychologists to discover that their evals are
> > not valid in a condition of a brain disease like Lyme, and that Lyme
> > has been spun. They may not know Lyme is not a bad knee. Clearly the
> > Stonington Schools were resistant to discovering that Lyme could be a
> > brain disease, and specifically these school psychologists, such as
> > Lori Liquori and John Glover, since they fought me tooth and nail
> > about giving Diane some extra help.
> >
> > I said, "READ this: 'The Neuropsychiatric aspects (COGNITIVE
> > DEFICITS)
> > of Lyme disease in children'," and these school staff members and the
> > principal refused to read it, and then wanted to send me and Diane to
> > a Psychiatrist. That response is even more stupid than I can comment
> > about.
> >
> > 20. THE NEGATIVE DATA. Kim DeMatteo
> > Gauvin DEMANDED Kim show up with her records. We found out by the
> > absence of this data, that indeed, Kim was Diane's LymeRage therapist,
> > and not mine, just like I said.
> >
> > 21. ATTEMPTS TO GET ASSISTANCE FROM THE DCF- 1996, 1998, and
> > 2002. Already in evidence, The Nov 16 databinders. My kids were
> > obviously much younger the in 1996. DCF blew me off, and my family
> > blew me off. I was literally stuck to the floor and could not move..
> >
> >
> > THE CONCEPT OF "THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHLDREN", the qualifications
> > of anyone who makes such a determination, and the perjury of the
> > witnesses.
> >
> > Number One Conclusion: Donald Dickson is a sociopath, and I am
> > autistic, and those are the only two "Mental Disorders" that have any
> > predictive potential. Don Dickson will continue to be an insane,
> > abusive, liar, and abuse the kids, and I will continue to be a
> > scientist and non-violent. Therefore the kids are with Don Dickson
> > because the DCF is a fraud of a child protection agency.
> >
> > Number Two Conclusion Psychotropics are brain damaging and CAUSE
> > violence, especially when used in children, and psychotropics is the
> > only "service" the DCF "provides". In addition to the November 16
> > databinder, Laura Lustig got the November 20 databinders, which
> > irrefutably prove, how brain damaging psychotropics are, and THAT is
> > the main reason my children were kidnapped and placed with a known
> > maniac, Don Dickson, and the State tried to arrest me or commit me
> > about 10 times.
> >
> > The best interests of children? That's what I hope to discover in
> > this administrative review hearing. The State cannot demonstrate that
> > I am wrong about anything, and I would like the WHOLE ROWLAND
> > ADMINISTRATION to attend, and try to refute Conclusion Number Two,
> > scientifically, and especially
> > Cathy Cook, (R-Mystic) who blew me off when I asked for help, over a
> > year ago, and then dared to have her hand out, to Mr. Rowland, for
> > money for her disabled child. And Cathy Cook is on the State's
> > Children's Committee, and thought Rowland did a bad thing, and made it
> > look like all "Republicans were on the take."
> >
> >
> > Psychiatry is a fraud of a medical practice, and that is why the State
> > could only bring Marcus, Leebens, and Phillips to do the most damage
> > they could, and lock me up, so I would stop saying all these true
> > things (all the emails)
> > And they did.
> >
> > The kids are with Don Dickson, the KNOWN CRAZY PERSON AND ABUSER AND
> > NEGLECTOR of children (and his wives), proving that Psychiatry is a
> > fraud of a medical practice, and the last thing it is, is a helper
> > profession, as demonstrated by the behavior of Phillips, Leebens,
> > Marcus, and Lustig, who were the only "experts" the State could come
> > up with, to lock me up, because I also said, Insurance Medicine uses
> > this same technique, DECLARE SICK PEOPLE TO BE CRAZY, rather than
> > treat their Lyme disease.
> >
> > Cathy Cook is also in favor of Managed Care, which was why I despised
> > her, when I saw this ad of hers come through Pfizer, years ago. We
> > can see any doctor we want, we wealthy, spoiled Pfizer people, but
> > that is not the case for most of the rest of the State, and I thought
> > this ad of hers, about her being in favor of Managed Care, was
> > shameful of her, for her to think we think like she does.
> >
> > And Cathy Cook is on the State's Children's Committee, and Rowland is
> > a crook and a hateful, selfish, person, JUST LIKE COOK. Cook also
> > played golf with my lawyer, last summer, and told him a bunch of
> > rotten things about me, and I suspect she interested him in running
> > for Republican office, which he did. And then I lost my kids.
> >
> > WHO is operating in the best interests of children? That's what I
> > hope we can discover in this "Administrative" Hearing. Perhaps Cook
> > can come and tell us about Managed Care and why she needs the State to
> > take care of her disabled son?
> >
> > WHO is competent to anything REASONABLE in this entire State as
> > regards the care of anyone, but themselves? I hope we can find out.
> > Thanks.
> >
> > KMDickson
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > h
> >
> >
> > I CERTIFY that a copy of these motions have been faxed to
> >
> > PRISCILLA HAMMOND, GAL
> > 860-434-5810
> >
> > SCOTT SAWYER, Laywer for the Children
> > 860-442-4131
> >
> > Robert McCoy, Lawyer for the Sociopath, Donald Dickson
> > 860-823-1535
> >
> > AAG Jessica Gauvin, the Borderline Disordered Attorney for the State
> > (Insane, lying viciousness, and aggression, documented perjury, for
> > the intended harm to children- This is Not slander)
> > 860 440-5845
> >
> > James Smith, Claims Commissioner
> > 860-566-3406
> >
> > Jeane Milstein, Child Advocate
> > 566-2251
> >
> > Christopher Morano
> > 860- 358-5858, Justice Commission
> >
> > Nora Dannehy, USDOJ, Hartford
> > 860-240-3291
> >
> > USDOJ, Kevin O'Connor
> >
> >
> > Google Home - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Jobs, Press, & Help
> >
> > ©2006 Google

.