Re: Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy (MSP), Monster Lyme Mom's (MLM)



Timeline: Sir Roy Meadow

Senior paediatrician Professor Sir Roy Meadow, whose expert evidence
helped jail Sally Clark, Angela Cannings and other women who were later
cleared of murdering their children, has today been struck off the
medical register by a disciplinary tribunal. David Batty explains the
history of the case

Friday July 15, 2005


November 1998
Donna Anthony is wrongly jailed for life at Bristol crown court for
murdering her 11-month-old daughter, Jordan, and four-month-old son,
Michael, after Professor Meadow and another expert tell the court that
the chances of two cot deaths in a case like hers were one in 1
million.
November 1999
Solicitor Sally Clark is wrongly jailed for life for murdering her two
baby sons, Christopher and Harry. Prof Meadow tells the jury there is a
one in 73 million chance of two cot deaths occurring in a family like
hers.

June 2000
Donna Anthony's first appeal against her conviction is dismissed.

October 2000
Mrs Clark's first appeal against her conviction is dismissed, despite
three judges accepting that Prof Meadow's statistical evidence was
incorrect. The actual odds of two babies dying of cot death in a family
like Mrs Clark's was just one in 77.

January 2003
The appeal court overturns Mrs Clark's conviction after it emerges that
a Home Office pathologist had failed to disclose microbiology tests on
her son Harry, which indicated he could have died from natural causes.
They added that Prof Meadow's statistical error alone should have made
her conviction unsafe.

June 2003
Trupti Patel is cleared of killing three of her babies, despite Sir Roy
putting forward the view that "two cot deaths is suspicious, three is
murder". The trial hears that Mrs Patel's maternal grandmother lost
five children in early infancy, suggesting a genetic disorder could
account for the deaths. A consultant paediatric pathologist also tells
the court that the broken ribs suffered by one of the babies could have
been the result of hospital resuscitation practices.

December 2003
Angela Cannings' conviction for killing her two baby sons is quashed
after a geneticist tells the appeal court that an undiscovered genetic
disorder could have been responsible for the deaths. The court says
that in future no prosecutions should be brought where medical experts
are in dispute and there is no other cogent evidence.

January 2004
The attorney general, Lord Goldsmith, orders a review of all
convictions over the previous 10 years of parents and carers for
killing children under two to see if they raised similar concerns to
those in the Cannings case.

December 2004
Lord Goldsmith announces that just six parents who claim they were
wrongly convicted of killing their children on disputed medical
evidence have asked the Criminal Cases Review Commission to refer their
cases to the court of appeal. Medical journal the Lancet publishes
research that concludes second cot deaths in the same family are far
more likely to be from natural cases than abuse.

April 2005
Mrs Anthony is freed after the court of appeal quashed her convictions
as "unsafe." The judge says her trial had been conducted on the basis
of Prof Meadow's now discredited theory that two sudden infant deaths
in the same family are statistically rare.

June 2005
Doctors' watchdog the General Medical Council (GMC) opens a serious
professional misconduct hearing on Prof Meadow's evidence in the Sally
Clark case.

July 2005
The GMC strikes Prof Meadow off the medical register after finding him
guilty of serious professional misconduct. The council decides he gave
"erroneous" and "misleading" evidence at Mrs Clark's trial.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cowboys herding cats
    ... the person was innocent--and evidence of that showed up after the ... innocence is inadmissible 21 days after the conviction. ... I have little doubt that the cops lied to you. ... "interview" and that they had enough to take the case to a Grand Jury ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)
  • Re: Bad science is still science
    ... The key part being experiment and evidence ... Then it might not have been an 'a-priori' conviction. ... we know that control dominates; not only molecules but protons and electrons ... I would suggest that the way scientists 'feel' that certain tests would ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Willingham case
    ... You're overlooking the advantages the DA has, like an army of cops and even his own investigators to gather evidence via means that a defense lawyer could only dream of, and a Grand Jury that will indict a ham sandwich if he asks it too. ... fresh look at the evidence and at the original trial the odds of an erroneous conviction are lessened. ... No, it isn't, murder requires intent to commit a crime, and if someone is mistakenly convicted of murder and executed without malice on the part of the prosecution or the jury or the judge then it's a horrific mistake, not murder. ... I haven't claimed DNA evidence is always available or always conclusive, so why are you responding to something I didn't express? ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: You have the right to remain slient...
    ... evidence that may be highly prejudicial. ... be admitted in cases of serious crime - rape and murder - where there ... to be revealed to the jury. ... heard how Voisey had a previous conviction for molesting a 12-year-old ...
    (soc.culture.irish)
  • Re: Sally Clark, dead at age 42
    ... He didn't give false evidence. ... serious infection in one of the children immediately prior to death. ... Cot deaths are rare so she must have ... by overwhelming bacterial infection. ...
    (uk.legal)