Re: Topic "Lyme activist arrested in forum General Support" at LymeNet Flash


Frank de Groot wrote:
Oh...I see! So...you think she SHOULD be locked up.

Anyone actively supporting terrorism should be locked up.
I have *very* right wing ideas about things like illegal immigration and
even legal immigration, and also about aiding and abetting terrorism.

LOL. I think people who insist on only using two dots in an ellipsis
are "terrorists" and should be locked up...and then expelled...swiftly.
International grammatical terrorists bent on a demonic obsession to
control the way people use the ellipsis in conversational English. Damn
them. Is that why you have to live in Norway? The Netherlands wouldn't
let you use only two dots? Well, you are not going to get away with
it...

You see, whether a person is a "terrorist" or a "freedom fighter"
striking a blow against oppression and injustice...very much depends on
whose oxen gets car-bombed.

Supporting terrorism = getting expelled. If you can't be expelled you should
be locked up in jail or in an asylumn.

Well, if you truly believe that...then I am sorry to have to inform you
that Stalinist Russia no longer exists...(probably some sort of utopian
ideal for you, I would imagine).

Personally, I don't believe anyone should ever be confined or
restrained involuntarily because of their political or religious
beliefs.

I think that people should be involuntarily restrained if they pose a
threat of immediate harm or danger to themselves or others, and should
be afforded due process of law.

See, there are important safeguards in both the judicial systems of the
UK and US to prevent an involuntary restraint based on the exercise of
free speech.

So, those who would insist that is what happened in either Kathleen's
or Lisa's case...have some high hurdles to leap over. (And are probably
good candidates themselves).


Kathleen knows what I mean. She's usually right when it comes to Lyme and
political issues and acts of secret-government sponsored false-flag
terrorism.


LOL. I don't think that is EXACTLY how you spoke about her when SHE got
locked up, now, is it, Frank? Yes, Kathleen is indeed, a woman of her
"convictions". No doubt about that.

Didn't you talk about how she was CRAZY? Something like that? Approved
of experimentation on monkeys? Ring a bell?

Damn, Frank...you're kind of a "fair weather friend", huh?

Familiar with that expression? It sort of means that you support
someone until they get their butts locked up...and then you slam them
and say they deserved it, somehow.

.

Quantcast