Re: The best example of how *stupid* lawyers are: The Supreme Court on scientific facts
- From: "the 3rd Man" <sir_der05@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Nov 2006 16:29:33 -0800
the 3rd Man wrote:
Chuck Hearts Foley wrote:
Your invitation to sit on the Supreme Court must have been lost in the
mail, somehow.
FYI...as usual, you are displaying, with your overly broad, sweeping,
stereo-typed generalizations, your underlying basic, raw ignorance and
crass stupidity.
A patent lawyer, for instance, usually has a technical degree in a
specialized field such as mechanical or electrical, or even
biomedical,
engineering.
You really are an unbelievable fool...an absolute blithering idiot.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: 2004 (Amrika): Cardiac involvement in non-human primates infected with Lyme disease
- Next by Date: Re: Lyme Disease Patients Denied Treatment Following New 2006 IDSA Guidelines: Connecticut Attorney General Launches Anti-Trust Investigation
- Previous by thread: The Yale Theory: People are Different in Europe
- Next by thread: Re: The best example of how *stupid* lawyers are: The Supreme Court on scientific facts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
