Re: Michael Crichton and the Wall Street Journal- Dinosaurs Update (The Tridiots)


Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
From:
kmdickson@xxxxxxxxxxx

[Add to Address Book]
To:
SpinLyme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jdrazen@xxxxxxxx, letters@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Jgerberding@xxxxxxx, lender@xxxxxxxxxxx, motomaniac_02186@xxxxxxxxx,
conndcj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, executive-editor@xxxxxxxxxxx,
managing-editor@xxxxxxxxxxx, news-tips@xxxxxxxxxxx,
the-arts@xxxxxxxxxxx, bizday@xxxxxxxxxxx, foreign@xxxxxxxxxxx,
metro@xxxxxxxxxxx, national@xxxxxxxxxxx, sports@xxxxxxxxxxx,
dvbid@xxxxxxx, brigidcallahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, trvl@xxxxxxxxxxx,
ubinas@xxxxxxxxxxx, spinlyme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mas1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx, jhornberger@xxxxxxx, thomas.carson@xxxxxxxxx,
editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kurtzh@xxxxxxxxxxxx, georgewill@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
horgan@xxxxxxxxxxx, commissioner.dcf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
cohencolumn@xxxxxxx, leonard.boyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, FalNields@xxxxxxx,
bransfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, vtsherr@xxxxxxxxxxx, mcneilel@xxxxxxx,
oca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
scott.murphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, attorney.general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
randall.sanborn@xxxxxxxxx,patrick.clifford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
thomas.ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC:
francam@xxxxxxxx,dr-ahmadinejad@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
eugenerobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx, dhaar@xxxxxxxxxxx, horgan@xxxxxxxxxxx,
bmiller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, eliot.spitzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, trvl@xxxxxxxxxxx,
rastro18@xxxxxxx, billcurry@xxxxxxxxxxx, thomas.carson@xxxxxxxxx,
amcguigan@xxxxxxxxxxx, rjmurzyn@xxxxxxx, paulcraigroberts@xxxxxxxxx,
sidney_blumenthal@xxxxxxxxx, criminal.division@xxxxxxxxx,
karla.dobinski@xxxxxxxxx, christopher.christie@xxxxxxxxx,
francam@xxxxxxxx, governor.rell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fitzmas@xxxxxxxxx,
patrick.fitzgerald@xxxxxxxxx,
modelt1918@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,dshapley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject:
Michael Crichton Wall Street Journal, False Claims Act, Research
FRAUD, and RICO
Date:
Saturday, December 23, 2006 5:32:43 AM

[View Source]

http://www.lifenews.com/bio1930.html

Yes, but they CAN be criminally charged under the FALSE CLAIMS ACT:
http://www.taf.org/

Yale has made a false claim that Lyme is a knee-only disease for
which OspA is the vaccine. Now Gary Wormser is committing the
exact same crime, and it is all about gaining a *monopoly* on the
bloodwork (all the blood and all the vector borne diseases, and all
the genetic data on susceptibilities to disease. They can't run their
monopoly without the blood. This is what I describe here:
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYME_CORRUPTICUT.htm
27) Martin J. Mattessich President & CEO, Director
"Prior to
becoming President and CEO of Agilix, from 1996 to 1999 Mr. Mattessich
was the
co-founder of two Yale University-sponsored biotechnology companies, L2

Diagnostics, LLC (diagnostic serology) and polyGenomics, Inc. (gene
discovery
for polygenic diseases) , and a consultant to CuraGen Corporation, a
publicly
held genomics company (pharmaceutical drug ...."

With the blood he intended to get from the L2 Diagnostics-Imugen
nationwide monopoly
on testing, they can identify new diseases to commercialize.

==========================================

*THAT* RICO is what Crichton is writing about in the Wall Street
Journal
and is what I described to the US Attorney:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIDyYWZ_24U&mode=related&search=

The monopoly was specifically to leave OspA out of the standard
when we know Allen Steere first claimed that it was OspA that
was causing the inflammation, and that is why SmithKline was
sued TWICE:
http://www.actionlyme.org/HOW_RICO_WILL_BE_CHARGED.htm

The FALSE CLAIM: Here is Allen Steere saying anti0OspA antibodies
is "Lyme Disease"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=PureSearch&db=pubmed&details_term=steere%20AC%5BAuthor%5D%20AND%20HLA%5BAll%20Fields%5D

ALLEN STEERE saying OspA and B are among the first antibodies to
show up:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=3531237


Another FALSE CLAIM is that the testing for Lyme is accurate.
It detects only 4% of the cases.

http://www.actionlyme.org/CRICHTON_A_STRANGE_DUDE.htm

These Lyme psychopaths are using the DCF morons since none of what
happens in a DCF "trial" is reality. I'm a "dangerously intelligent"
"chemist " "like Ted Kascynski "the Unibomber?"

Ya think?

The Unibomber testified in front of the FDA and built websites?
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf

That "dangerously intelligent" "like Ted Kascynski" bull crap was
invented
by two State of CT "forensic psychiatrists" with ties to Yale and who
said these
things AFTER I filed the RICO complaint to the US Attorney's Office,
which was
VERY CLEAR AND CONCISE and had been SCANNED into my website
BEFORE this "court" nonsense:
http://www.actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm

So now you know what psychiatric "expertise" is worth. They're all
nuts.

They ALL SCUM. No-nad dickless, brainless, sex-obsessed, selfish,
incompetent whores for the "court." DMHAS and DCF. 'Nothing
scientific
or medical going on at all and these racketeers like it just fine like
that,
thanks. (BigInsurance knows how to game the whores who are too
stupid to even *know* they are being gamed. PRIDE gets in the way
of intelligence. Ego. That's why I find Simon Wessely so hilarious:
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/313/7072/1594
He does not even know he is explaining the exact reason he is a fool.
"People elated by pride ... are seldom qualified to form a just
estimate of
their actual situation."10)

http://www.actionlyme.org/DANGEROUSLY_IGNORANT.htm

http://www.actionlyme.org/BIOWEAPONEERS_CORIXA_YALE_TLRS.htm

How Lyme Borreliosis and LYMErix cause immune suppression illness,
and why that has Bioweapon potential:

"Signaling through TLR-2 by lipoproteins may represent a double-edged
sword for
host responses to chronic intracellular pathogens such as M.
tuberculosis.
Short-term signaling through TLR-2 activates
macrophages and initiates acute inflammation that may help control
initial
infection. In contrast, prolonged TLR-2 signaling in macrophages
results in
down-regulation of certain critical immune functions, such as MHC-II Ag

processing. M. tuberculosis infects, survives, and persists in
macrophages. The
ability of M. tuberculosis to survive acute inflammation positions the
bacilli
to take advantage, through secretion of lipoproteins such as LprG and
LpqH, of
this down-regulation of macrophage immune function."
http://www.jimmunol.org/cgi/content/full/173/4/2660

What that means is that no antibodies are produced after a time
(the illness becomes "seronegative, or STEALTH).

Chronic Borreliosis (Lyme) does the same thing.

The same type of antigen as LYMErix is found in mycoplasmas.

These are stealth disablers. You deploy one and the recipients wonder
for years what happened to their crop or llivestock yield as it
decreases
slowly over time. You can easily pharm in an attribute like OspA.
It's like
a time bomb. The bugs bleb or shed these outer surface proteins or
"vesicles"
rendering the immune system incompetent:

From an Alan Barbour patent:
http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,719,983.PN.&OS=PN/6,719,983&RS=PN/6,719,983


"2.1 Methods of Treatment

"An important aspect of the invention is the recognition that Borrelia
VMP-like
sequences recombine at the vls site, with the result that antigenic
variation is
virtually limitless. Multiclonal populations therefore can exist in an
infected
patient so that immunological defenses are severely tested if not
totally
overwhelmed."


That means the Yale/Steere/Dearborn method is useless.

The damage is ongoing but after a while there are no antibody markers.

Deploy the psychiatric idiot to imaginate the cause of the symptoms.


They're not getting away with this bull*** end of discussion.

It is FRAUDULENT to deploy a psychiatridiot (psych-i-a--trid-i-ot)
when these very same people discovered all the scientifically
valid markers of disease:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BIOMARKERS.htm

The Tridiots' Association even say a medical rule out should be done
first.
http://www.actionlyme.org/MALPRACTICE_TREATMENT_OF_LYME.htm

Too bad they don't even know how to find a single valid marker
of disease. They don't even know LUPUS means the antiphospholipid
antibodies affect... guess what... phospholipids, which are found
where?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=8410057&query_hl=4&itool=pubmed_docsum
"Given the clinical associations of patients with neuroborreliosis and
syphilis
with IgM reactivity to gangliosides sharing the Gal(beta 1-3) GalNac
terminus,
we suggest that these antibodies could represent a response to injury
in
neurological disease or a cross reactive event caused by spirochetes."

By Allen Steere!!


Jurassic Park Crichton misses the point about the dangers
of dinosaurs. The American Psychiatric Association has 35,000
members.

KMDickson

==============================================

To:
<SpinLyme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:
[SpinLyme] With Medical Research, Our Bodies Are Not Our Own
Date:
Friday, December 22, 2006 1:43:16 PM

[View Source]

http://www.lifenews.com/bio1930.html

Michael Crichton: With Medical Research, Our Bodies Are Not Our Own
Email this
article
Printer friendly page
by Wesley J. Smith
December 20, 2006

Best selling author Michael Crichton warned in last Friday's Wall
Street Journal
(no link available) that people's cells and body substances are no
longer
necessarily their own, once removed from the body. Scientists can use
your cells
and blood to conduct research upon, and if they are fortunate, develop
into
medical products that will make them billions.
And you have no right, apparently, to stop them or to share in the
wealth that were, in part, generated by your body parts.

But what about the terms of consent agreements? Apparently, courts
often refuse
to enforce limiting terms put in to protect patients.

This matter arose most recently in a case out of Washington University
in
Missouri. Prostate cancer patients had agreed to allow their tissues to
be used
in research. But, Crichton writes, a court refused to enforce the
limitations in
the consent forms they signed!

"The decision surprised many. As a recipient of federal funds,
Washington
University was required to follow the federal regulations on informed
consent
for tissues received from patients. This included acknowledging in
writing that
the tissues would be used only for prostate research, that patients had
the
right to withdraw from the study at any time, and to have their tissue
samples
destroyed upon request.

"However, Judge Limbaugh ruled that patients had no such rights. In his
view,
the right to withdraw merely meant the right not to contribute more
tissues. The right to have the tissues destroyed meant only that the
samples would
be used anonymously. The guarantee that tissues would only be used for
prostate
research could be ignored, and WU was free to use the tissues for any
purpose
whatever."

So once again, words become meaningless as definitions are changed to
suit
desired ends.

Crichton's conclusion illustrates the growing power of the
Science-Industrial
Complex, in which universities are becoming almost despotic in their
drive to
make fortunes through biological research unfettered by
societal-desired ethical
constraints.

He writes: "Research universities around the country greeted the ruling
with
unseemly enthusiasm, and hastily joined forces to prevent a successful
legal
appeal. Although the National Institutes of Health and other federal
centers
conduct research under the federal guidelines, universities now claim
that these
rules are impossibly onerous and impede research. Unless researchers
are allowed
to do whatever they want, they warn patients, the flow of life-saving
miracles will dry up.

"...For universities, perhaps the most damaging outcome may be the loss
of
confidence that patients feel in major centers of research and healing.
There
was a time when physicians were ranked just below Supreme Court
justices. Those
days are long gone. Our university hospitals and major medical centers
still
command respect. But the perception that they are businesses like any
other is
growing stronger every day. Except, they're not--they're non-profits,
exempt
from most of the rules and disclosures that are required of American
businesses.
In short, caveat patiens, keep copies of everything you sign, bring a
lawyer to
every medical appointment, and always, always watch your back."

Meanwhile, these warnings are generally ignored by the cheer leader
media and
lost amidst the torch parades in which everyone yells, "CURES! CURES!
CURES!"

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

.

Quantcast