Re: Congratulations to Kathleen for being the most productive author
- From: Sewer Rat <ratfromthesewer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:34:04 +0100
LunaTick wrote:
Productive? What do you mean?
If you are talking about all time posts, if they added all my posts
from previous e-mail address it would be on top. Kathy has used the
same e-mail
since she started posting here, that is why it's so high.
The current e-mail I use was not used till 2005
(chuckadams05@xxxxxxx) I have used nychillary2000 and few others
before that since
I was posting in here from the late 90's.
Yes, I know. If they added all posts from several e-mail addresses of one person, then the top 10 would look different. For example Frank de Groot would also have been high in the top 10.
And of course quantity is one thing, quality is another. IMO "The 3rd Man" is an example of a valuable contributor of this newsgroup.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Lyme Rage..
- Next by Date: Re: Lyme Rage..
- Previous by thread: Re: Congratulations to Kathleen for being the most productive author
- Next by thread: Re: Congratulations to Kathleen for being the most productive author
- Index(es):