Re: An odd statement?--IDSA Guidelines
- From: "lipanz" <lipanzmarija7@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Mar 2007 20:30:01 -0700
On Mar 25, 11:21�am, "the 3rd Man" <sir_de...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. 3RD MANNotice this:
"If patients without Lyme disease were enrolled, which is likely,
clinical improvement might have been due in part to the anti-
inflammatory properties of both the macrolide [300] and
hydroxychloroquine, rather than by an antimicrobial effect".
Yes, well, that is sort of interesting, because it seems to imply that
antibiotics could offer Lyme patients relief...due to anti-
inflammatory properties of the antibiotic.
So...why not prescribe them for THAT reason?
It would seem as though Parkinson's, MS, some ALS patients are
currently being treated with antibiotics for this exact, anti-
inflammatory principle.
So how can you discriminate against their use in the inflammatory
"post-Lyme syndrome", whose symptoms so closely resemble the above-
mentioned diseases as to be indistinguishable?
You know, the syndrome that Steere says is so debillitating.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An odd statement?--IDSA Guidelines
- From: Sewer Rat
- Re: An odd statement?--IDSA Guidelines
- References:
- An odd statement?--IDSA Guidelines
- From: the 3rd Man
- An odd statement?--IDSA Guidelines
- Prev by Date: Re: CNN article on silver.
- Next by Date: Re: An odd statement?--IDSA Guidelines
- Previous by thread: An odd statement?--IDSA Guidelines
- Next by thread: Re: An odd statement?--IDSA Guidelines
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|