Re: IV ABX Study for Psychosis

On Feb 18, 8:56�am, itsybitsy...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00591318?term=lyme+disease&rank=14

Just what it says. It's Fallon's new study.

Refractory Psychosis from previously treated Lyme is what they want...


Unfortunately 40 doses of rocpephin monday to friday doesn't seem to
me to be very likely to help those with refractory psychosis.

The study design seems too similar to the first fallon study, almost
designed to fail. I don't blame fallon except that he ought to know
that this is unlikely to work and the results will be interpreted to
mean that iv rocephin isn't the answer. If his first study looked
first at this sort of treatment and then longer treatment durations it
would have been one thing. Instead treating people inadequately is
simply interpreted as treatment failure. Also the first study which
had reports of enough adverse events is simply being interpreted to
mean that (in llmd terms SHORT) courses of iv rocephin not only don't
cure but are more dangerous than beneficial.

Also I doubt kathleen would qualify because it seems unlikely that she
recognizes her delusions as such and because I doubt she is on a
stable course of anti psychotic medications for a long enough time to
meet the criteria. She ought to be but I seriously doubt she is. If
she is boy those drugs sure aren't working.

It would be nice if kathleen would avail herself of help. One of the
issues though is she thinks of psychiatry in an even more hostile way
than most scientologists do. And doesn't listen to people urging her
to get help or, in the past, offering to help her get help.

By the way, I don't know if the lyme activist kathleen supporters
loyal fan club realize that long before the DCF came and rescued her
kids, that kathleen herself contacted DCF at least twice and asked
them to take her kids, according to her own postings here. Probably
one of her more rational moments. But it sure puts a different "spin"
on things than the absurd claims that she was silenced because of her
scary whistleblowing by a huge government conspiracy spanning the
globe. And that she admits having made a bomb threat to her children's
school. And showing up at their safe house with a bag filled with
drugs after they were taken from her. And repeatedly calling and
subjecting them to abusive language repetitively. And then injecting
herself into a case involving a family she didn't know to the point
where a restraining order was issued against her.

And if you noticed she is now claiming that the FBI told her that she
can use deadly force against the DCF and is giving that advice to
others.

Is she mentally ill? Absolutely. Is she dangerous? It is worrisome
that she is now declaring that she believes the FBI told her it is
okay to use deadly force against DCF. No way is that true. And people
like her with all her anger and bitterness and delusions and
conspiracy theories some of which involve government officials have
been known to act upon all that, like the guy recently in Missouri
City who shot up the city council meeting and killed five people
including two cops. Kathleen's history includes having been convicted
of stalking and harassment and part of the evidence was that she
threatened the asst atty general Jessica Gauvin but also had Ms
Gauvin't home address and a map to her home.

So I'd say rather than assuming she isn't dangerous it is safer to
assume that she is. It isn't like her invectives towards Jessica
Gauvin and everyone involved in her case has lessened with time or
that she has abided by her promise to stop emailing and faxing the
planet with her crap. If anything it is all as bad or worse than it
ever was.

Yeah Kathleen is a potential threat to people.

Honestly I don't know why there hasn't been some official intervention
but I'm not in charge of the connecticut law enforcement or court
systems.

She obviously needs help and isn't getting it on her own.

Maybe you can understand why certain people including me think that
those who encourage and enable her have a fair amount of responsiblity
for kathleen's actions.

.