Tough Times with Pat Smith's LDA Tards / Lyme victims are really dense: Maggie Shaw

To: zerhoune@xxxxxxxxxx, SpinLyme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kshepard@xxxxxxxxx,
fitzmas@xxxxxxxxx, patrick.fitzgerald@xxxxxxxxx,
modelt1918@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jdrazen@xxxxxxxx, letters@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Jgerberding@xxxxxxx, lender@xxxxxxxxxxx, michael.cole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
conndcj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, executive-editor@xxxxxxxxxxx, managing-
editor@xxxxxxxxxxx, news-tips@xxxxxxxxxxx, the-arts@xxxxxxxxxxx,
bizday@xxxxxxxxxxx, foreign@xxxxxxxxxxx, metro@xxxxxxxxxxx,
national@xxxxxxxxxxx, dvbid@xxxxxxx, brigidcallahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
trvl@xxxxxxxxxxx, ubinas@xxxxxxxxxxx, mas1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
campbell@xxxxxxxxxxx, jhornberger@xxxxxxx, thomas.carson@xxxxxxxxx,
thomas.ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kurtzh@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
georgewill@xxxxxxxxxxxx, horgan@xxxxxxxxxxx,
commissioner.dcf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cohencolumn@xxxxxxx,
FalNields@xxxxxxx, bransfield@xxxxxxxxxxx, vtsherr@xxxxxxxxxxx,
oca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
scott.murphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, governor.rell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
attorney.general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, randall.samborn@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: francam@xxxxxxxx, dr-ahmadinejad@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
eugenerobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx, horgan@xxxxxxxxxxx,
bmiller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, trvl@xxxxxxxxxxx, rastro18@xxxxxxx,
billcurryct@xxxxxxxxx, thomas.carson@xxxxxxxxx, amcguigan@xxxxxxxxxxx,
rjmurzyn@xxxxxxx, paulcraigroberts@xxxxxxxxx,
sidney_blumenthal@xxxxxxxxx, criminal.division@xxxxxxxxx,
karla.dobinski@xxxxxxxxx, christopher.christie@xxxxxxxxx

Subject: Lyme victims are really dense: Maggie Shaw

Date: May 31, 2008 12:49 AM

(ARTICLE BELOW)

YIKES!!

Allow me to un-dement the public:

1) The current CDC testing for Lyme is scientifically invalid (confirm
with the
FDA Bioanalytics Division), in that Yale's proposal that, "Our ONE
ANTIGEN
is SPECIFIC enough to PREVENT Lyme, OspA, while our other patent
(5,618,533) is
also SPECIFIC enough to DETECT Lyme (100% or nearly 100%), but
everyone needs to
have Late Lyme arthritis in a knee with the super-high antibody
concentration seen
an an allergy reaction, and as shown in the RICO complaint graphic:
http://www.actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm
"

That's what this Yale/NYMC Lyme cabal is claiming.


The Dressler/Steere proposal - NOT AVAILABLE FREE FULL TEXT ONLINE
ANYWHERE EXCEPT MY WEBSITE - shows that Steere said "the presence of
the disease is confirmed
by the presence of VERY HIGH ANTIBODY CONCENTRATION:"
http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION_FULL.htm
I gave it all to the FDA Vaccine Committee, but the FDA Vaccine
Committee is a bunch
of tards, too. (They're picked to serve America because they meet the
single
dot guv criterion of being incompetent.)

One of the attributes of a valid analytical method is to reliably
detect the lowest
concentration of the analyte in question- the complete opposite of
what Steere proposed.

So, what Steere proposes, and what this cabal proposes, and what the
CDC proposes...
is complete and total BULL *** on TESTING FOR LYME.


2) Secondly, the way to phrase TREATMENT outcomes, is to say, "THE
CROOKS
ARE PLAYING A SHELL GAME with the DNA primers and have never once used
the correct
primers to assess treatment outcomes:"
http://www.actionlyme.org/PRIMSERSHELLGAME.htm

AND, as I said in my first website, in November 2000, these bastards
do not know
what we are infected with, so how can there be a standard of care for
"WE DON'T
KNOW WHAT YOU HAVE"?

http://www.geocities.com/kmdickson0308/lyme-dilemma.html


It would be better if Pat Smith's lymediseaseassociation.org
tards would refrain from revealing how stupid they are in the
media and in letters to the editor.

The best test for Lyme would be a batch of recombinant SPECIFIC
flagellins for the
vast majority of the Borreliae out there, and not just Burgdorfer's
Borrelia.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=138

No one cares which Borreliae they have.
(No one cares which DISEASE they have, for that matter, as long as we
all get relief- that being the aspect of medical training these RICO
criminals apparently
missed.)


I would advise Pat Smith to keep her tards out of the media
because doctors may be reading these demented arguments and
we can't have them getting even more foncused than they
already are.

To Wit: Not a single MD unscrambled this crime and not a single
MD in America ever presented the crime in a coherent manner to
law enforcement or even the FDA.

NOT ONE.

- - -

PAT SMITH's GANG NEEDS TO STAY OUT OF THE SCIENCE, here.
For years Smith rejected the science, and told her tards
just to whine to the media. Smith really does not want
all this abuse to end, because then what would she do with
herself if there was no IT'S ALL_ABOUT-MEEee!!!
campaign to blowhard over?

Pat Smith trains her tards to appear to be dimwits,
on purpose. To any casual observer, putting a decked
out Greenwich-ite yuppie in the news - who is clueless
to the science - merely supports the crooks' assertion
that we're all desperate housewives:
http://www.actionlyme.org/UN_PETITION.htm


Kathleen M. Dickson
-------------------------
http://www.newstimes.com/ci_9424734
Letter: Profits in the way of Lyme treatment
Article Last Updated: 05/30/2008 06:40:51 AM EDT

In response to Donald Poretz, M.D., of the Infectious Diseases Society
of America
(letter, May 22):

Note the reason that the investigation of the IDSA's current Lyme
disease guidelines
were never brought to court or resulted in legal findings was a choice
that the
IDSA made.

Court would have resulted in evidence of conflicts of interest of the
14 members
who authored the Lyme guidelines. Many of these members hold patents
on Lyme disease
and co-infections, received funding from Lyme or co-infection test kit
manufacturers,
or have been paid by insurance companies to write Lyme policy
guidelines or serve
as consultants in legal cases.

The majority of the 14 also received money from Lyme disease vaccine
manufacturers.
Patents and profits are not helping those suffering. Big business in
health care
is unacceptable!

Most funding for Lyme research has gone into vaccines and diagnostics,
not for treatment.

Dr. Poretz, please come to my community where it is almost impossible
to find someone
who has not had Lyme disease. There are too many chronically ill and
debilitated.

This suffering is for the most part propagated by the IDSA guidelines'
reliance
on testing for diagnosis and restrictive treatment. There is no test
available to
show that your statement of cure is validated. Lyme is a clinical
diagnosis (CDC).

There are two standards of recognized care for Lyme. People in our
community are
not being informed of the International Lyme and Associate Diseases
Advertisement
guidelines. Danbury Hospital's Lyme Disease Task Force pontificates
IDSA.

Both guidelines must be provided to maintain patient autonomy and the
ability to
give informed consent. Principles of medical ethics are being
violated.

People's lives and health cannot be ruled by 14 members of the IDSA,
whose ulterior
motives are riddled with conflicts of interest and documented bias
against chronic
Lyme disease.

Maggie Shaw

NEWTOWN
.

Loading