Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- From: Sewer Rat <ratfromthesewer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 22:58:44 +0200
the 3rd Man wrote:
Depends on what you mean by "cured"...how you define it.
If you are, I would think, relieved of symptoms...I would guess most
people would believe themselves "cured"...even if a few leftover
spiros remain.
Unless the body's immune response is now totally and completely
ineffective...wouldn't one expect that the immune system could handle
the mop-up of remaining spirochetes?
Perhaps one would expect, but how many spirochetes are entering the body in case of a bite from an infected tick? Can't be that many either, but still the immune system can't always handle them. So, I don't know, perhaps in some, but not all, cases the immune system can handle the remaining spirochetes.
"CONCLUSION: Ceftriaxone fails to cure Lyme Disease due to the
intracellularity
of the spirochetes."
NO.
Indeed, correct would be to conclude that ceftriaxone fails to eradicate all spirochetes; which does not necessarily imply that it fails to cure Lyme Disease.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- From: the 3rd Man
- Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- References:
- NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- From: Mort Zuckerman
- Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- From: the 3rd Man
- NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- Prev by Date: Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- Next by Date: Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- Previous by thread: Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- Next by thread: Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|