Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- From: the 3rd Man <derdrittemann2003@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 17:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 8, 3:58 pm, Sewer Rat <ratfromthese...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
#3 wrote: " Unless the body's immune response is now totally and
completely
ineffective...wouldn't one expect that the immune system could handle
the mop-up of remaining spirochetes"?
Perhaps one would expect, but how many spirochetes are entering the body
in case of a bite from an infected tick? Can't be that many either, but
still the immune system can't always handle them. So, I don't know,
perhaps in some, but not all, cases the immune system can handle the
remaining spirochetes.
Yes. I really don't know, either. Just trying to elaborate on the
point that "cure" does not necessarily equal total eradication of
every last spirochete.
"CONCLUSION: Ceftriaxone fails to cure Lyme Disease due to the
intracellularity
of the spirochetes."
NO.
Indeed, correct would be to conclude that ceftriaxone fails to eradicate
all spirochetes; which does not necessarily imply that it fails to cure
Lyme Disease.
Yes, this is really the only point that I was trying to make.
.
- References:
- NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- From: Mort Zuckerman
- Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- From: the 3rd Man
- Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- From: Sewer Rat
- NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- Prev by Date: Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- Next by Date: IDSA knows that chronic Lyme exists
- Previous by thread: Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- Next by thread: Re: NEWS: Mark Klempner and The Science.
- Index(es):