Re: HOW WE CAME TO BELIEVE THAT THE LOW-FAT DIET IS GOOD AND CHOLESTEROL IS BAD
From: Mirek Fidler (cxl_at_volny.cz)
Date: 07/28/04
- Next message: Mirek Fidler: "Re: Whole dietary patterns vs. reductionist approach"
- Previous message: Mirek Fidler: "Re: Complete carb vs. refined carb sources and diabetes risk"
- In reply to: tcomeau: "Re: HOW WE CAME TO BELIEVE THAT THE LOW-FAT DIET IS GOOD AND CHOLESTEROL IS BAD"
- Next in thread: tcomeau: "Re: HOW WE CAME TO BELIEVE THAT THE LOW-FAT DIET IS GOOD AND CHOLESTEROL IS BAD"
- Reply: tcomeau: "Re: HOW WE CAME TO BELIEVE THAT THE LOW-FAT DIET IS GOOD AND CHOLESTEROL IS BAD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:08:26 +0200
"tcomeau" <tunderbar@hotmail.com> píse v diskusním príspevku
news:b550f406.0407280634.4d9414b8@posting.google.com...
> Harvard has been pushing against the low-carb woe since the very
> beginning. And in very unscientific ways. I lump them in with Duke U
> and the food and pharma industries. They are pushing agendas based on
> profit and not science. Just another bastion in a long line of
> bastions of higher education corrupted by grants from industry.
I do not know. Last time I have heard Harvard, it was much more
supportive of low-carb.
Their food pyramide is certainly closer to low-carb than traditional
one.
Mirek
- Next message: Mirek Fidler: "Re: Whole dietary patterns vs. reductionist approach"
- Previous message: Mirek Fidler: "Re: Complete carb vs. refined carb sources and diabetes risk"
- In reply to: tcomeau: "Re: HOW WE CAME TO BELIEVE THAT THE LOW-FAT DIET IS GOOD AND CHOLESTEROL IS BAD"
- Next in thread: tcomeau: "Re: HOW WE CAME TO BELIEVE THAT THE LOW-FAT DIET IS GOOD AND CHOLESTEROL IS BAD"
- Reply: tcomeau: "Re: HOW WE CAME TO BELIEVE THAT THE LOW-FAT DIET IS GOOD AND CHOLESTEROL IS BAD"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]