Re: Fasting and weight loss

From: Steve Freides (steve_at_fridayscomputer.com)
Date: 07/30/04


Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:14:30 -0400


"Roger Lepine" <body_222@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8f9d5e28.0407240824.5267a31b@posting.google.com...
> Dear experts,
>
> Here's an interesting question for you.
>
> Given: a standard 2000 calorie diet.
> Activity: normal office activity, no exercise
> Weight: 200 pounds, male.
>
> If a person fasts for, 32-36 hours, say from
> Thursday night, until Saturday morning,
>
> What can the expected weight loss be for the this
> time period?
>
> Perhaps 10 glasses of water drunk through this
> time period.
>
>
> Remembering my high school science, there is
> the law of conservation of mass.
>
> Applied to eating, this means, that to gain
> 10 pounds, you must consume at least 10
> pounds of food and water. Obviously, a lot
> more than 10 pounds, because so much of the
> food and water is converted to energy, waste,
> and evaporated through the skin.
>
> With this physics, you cannot eat a few ounzes,
> and gain a few pounds.
>
> Assume all other things being equal.
>
> I know that diet has become a religious war
> item these days, and I'm not interested in such.
>
> Please don't bother speculating about long
> term averages, about eating more when you break
> the fast, etc. Or about exercise, red herrings,
> or other variables that are not in the question.
>
> Please also don't bother talking about
> whether this is adviseable or not.
>
> Just the answer please.
>
> Hopefully based on some kind of science or
> experience, not speculation.

See http://www.kbnj.com/wd.htm for information about the Warrior Diet.
I follow this approach, and I fast until dinner most days, usually
drinking only water although sometimes drinking tea or coffee, and once
in a while having a small amount of a healthy snack such as nuts. The
research about alternating cycles of over- and under-eating continues to
grow. A recent animal study, using one day of fasting alternated with
one day of completely unrestricted eating, showed improvements in both
leanness and gaining muscle mass.

It's worth mentioning that, until you get used to not eating for
relatively long periods of time, your body will just go into what some
people call "starvation mode" and you will burn fewer calories than you
usually do. It's quite possible not to lose much weight at all doing
what you suggest, and to find your weight right back to where you
started 48 hours after you start eating again.

-S-
http://www.kbnj.com



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Anybody else on a diet here?
    ... the good news is that it is working nicely and I've lost 12-3/4 pounds so ... I've tried smoking my pipe when I'm hungry - it works sometimes, ... Just finished a diet contest here at work. ... normally might be eating. ...
    (alt.smokers.pipes)
  • Re: OT - Calorie Counts
    ... The great thing about eating low-carb is that the diet ... When the Atkins diet was first promoted in the early 1970's, ... |> allows "good" carbs after weight loss commences. ...
    (rec.arts.mystery)
  • Re: OT - Calorie Counts
    ... The great thing about eating low-carb is that the diet ... When the Atkins diet was first promoted in the early 1970's, ... |> allows "good" carbs after weight loss commences. ...
    (rec.arts.mystery)
  • Re: Starting Glucophage
    ... In my case, I travel extensively with my job, so taking food along other than snack crackers is out of the question. ... I might as well have been eating straight sugar! ... I manage only on diet and exercise. ... Like I've said previously, my diet has no wheat, rice, potatoes, fruit juices. ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: Starting Glucophage
    ... Sounds like you're getting the hang of eating out. ... I manage only on diet and exercise. ... longer test before meals because my numbers are always in the double ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)