Sugar's secret sweetener offer to health chiefs

From: Philippic (slxeeoxgxr_at_slxoxgxr.com)
Date: 10/03/04

  • Next message: Detector: "Re: How much sugar is too much?" 
    Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 00:51:46 GMT

    Sugar's secret sweetener offer to health chiefs

    http://society.guardian.co.uk/publichealth/story/0,11098,1318635,00.html

    Industry hopes cash will influence anti-obesity drive

    Jo Revill, health editor
    Sunday October 3, 2004
    The Observer

    The sugar industry is planning to offer substantial sums of sponsorship
    money to the World Health Organisation as part of a secret attempt to
    influence the body's attempts to combat obesity worldwide.
    The Observer has obtained a confidential briefing document outlining the
    sugar producers' new strategy for getting into the key meetings held in the
    WHO's Geneva headquarters.

    The document was written by the British head of the World Sugar Research
    Organisation, which is wholly funded by sugar producers. It reveals the
    body's intention to offer a large amount of funding in order to be granted
    non-governmental organisation (NGO) status - something it has so far been
    denied.

    But the document also shows how the organisation has analysed whether the
    key WHO officials are hostile to its interests, highlighting its desire to
    win over policymakers who will have a big influence on countries that are
    trying to improve their national diet.

    The document has dismayed officials at WHO and food campaigners, who believe
    the industry is trying to subvert attempts to introduce policies aimed at
    reducing sugar levels.

    After being shown the document, Professor Philip James - a world authority
    on food who drafted the first report warning of the threat of obesity back
    in 1990 and is now chair of the International Obesity Taskforce - said:
    'This is a ruthless and vicious strategy to undermine the work being done
    around the world to enable people to have healthier diets.

    'Does the sugar industry really believe it can bribe the WHO? Has it come to
    this?'

    Evidence is mounting that sugar is not only the cause of tooth decay, but
    also one of the major causes of obesity and heart disease. Nutritionists
    believe governments should be doing far more to warn the public of the
    dangers of foods which contain high sugar levels.

    Earlier this year, the WHO produced its Global Strategy on Diet, Physical
    Activity and Health, in the face of lobbying from food manufacturers and, in
    particular, countries with strong sugar interests. The industry managed to
    ensure that the strategy did not refer to an expert report, known as 916,
    which recommended that no more than 10 per cent of an adult's daily
    calorific intake should come from added sugar.

    But, at the same time, Britain and France were instrumental in preventing
    the sugar lobby from being granted NGO status at the meetings, despite
    intense pressure from the United States and elsewhere. However, such
    opposition has not stopped its attempts.

    A report prepared by Dr Richard Cottrell, director general of the WSRO and
    head of the Sugar Bureau in London, was written after an informal meeting
    this summer with Andre Prost, a WHO director with reponsibility for liaising
    between his organisation and private industry.

    'It is clear that WSRO will need to offer some form of collaboration with
    WHO, involving substantial sponsorship, to be considered for NGO status,'
    Cottrell writes. He adds: 'What is not clear is the extent of sponsorship
    expected and whether it will be possible to identify a project that would be
    acceptable to WHO but of direct value to the sugar industry.'

    The document also names officials whom they believe to be blocking their
    way. 'It is also clear that certain individuals connected with Report 916
    remain implacably hostile to the sugar industry, including [Derek] Yach.'
    Yach, a key figure in formulating the 916 report, has since left.

    'Fortunately,' Cottrell continues, ' there does not now seem to be a defined
    group of anti-sugar staff within WHO.' However, Cottrell also suggests that
    the head of WHO, Lee Jong-Wook, may not be in place for too long. 'Dr Lee is
    apparently not inclined to allow WHO to become heavily involved in
    implementing any diet and health activities. He is himself under pressure,
    however, as a result of the poor performance of several of his senior
    appointees.'

    The report illustrates the measures the industry is prepared to adopt to
    circumvent an international attempt to improve public health. The US Sugar
    Association questioned the validity of the 916 report at every stage, and
    even suggested to President Bush that he withdraw funding from WHO unless
    the 10 per cent recommendation was withdrawn.

    It also emerged earlier this year that the US had submitted a 30-page report
    criticising the WHO for its lack of scientific evidence. 'Big sugar' gives
    millions of dollars to the Republican party, and to the the Bush campaign,
    and the President's administration argued that there was little robust
    evidence to show that eating too much sugar was a direct cause of obesity.

    Leading scientists took up the cause shortly before the crucial World Health
    Assembly meeting in May, accusing the US of making the health of millions of
    young Americans 'a hostage to fortune' because they had failed to combat
    their own epidemic of a diet laden with fat and sugar.

    But today's new document shows that the sugar battle is far from over and
    that the industry is intent on entering into the discussions.

    Cottrell was yesterday determined to defend his position, despite the
    leaking of his own report. He said: 'We are not expecting [to have] undue
    influence; we simply want an opportunity to make our expertise available.'

    But the report was met with astonishment at the WHO, which countered any
    suggestion that sponsorship money would win the industry a place at the
    discussion table.

    Dr Catherine le Galles-Camus, assistant director of the department dealing
    with the global strategy, said: 'They know we are not keen to see some trade
    association being recognised as an NGO.

    'From the beginning, they [the sugar industry] have used these tactics. We
    do work with the private sector but only as far as it is committed to
    preventing disease.' 

    -- 
Philippic
  • Next message: Detector: "Re: How much sugar is too much?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Health experts attack sugar industry in fight against obesity
      ... >> people's health worldwide. ... Concealing the dangers of sugar??? ... As if the sugar industry ...
      (sci.med.nutrition)
    • Cubas painful transition from sugar economy
      ... Cuba's countryside as the island abandons much of traditional sugar ... "You can imagine, when the mill closed people were mad, they were confused, ... an area equal to 62 percent of Cuba's arable land. ... organization," international sugar industry analyst G.B. Hagelberg said. ...
      (soc.culture.cuba)
    • Re: what do you drink on long rides?
      ... If they work in some industry lab then you can ... expect them to be influenced by the company policy. ... is funded by the sugar ... One senator said that if there was any chance, however small, that saccharin causes cancer, it should be banned. ...
      (rec.bicycles.tech)
    • Cuba Plans Big Increase in Ethanol Production
      ... HAVANA - Cuba hopes to take advantage of high sugar prices and the ethanol boom to revitalize its industry and greatly increase alcohol production, a senior ministry official said Tuesday. ...
      (soc.culture.cuba)
    • Re: what do you drink on long rides?
      ... If they work in some industry lab then you can ... expect them to be influenced by the company policy. ... colleagues and they have their own reputation and reputation of ... is funded by the sugar ...
      (rec.bicycles.tech)