Re: Reverse coronary calcium deposits?

From: Robert (RobertJ_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/19/04 

Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:07:46 -0700

"Phil Scott" <philscott888@sf.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:caZcd.15706$nj.4775@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Robert" <RobertJ@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:10n8j22isfqt9d5@corp.supernews.com...
> > Do me a favor Phil and do a search on the net for "Crap" and
> you will find
> > plenty of it. Your posts included. Now I am too smart to do
> it for you
> > because I know all the answers and you will just have to
> find them for
> > yourself. That makes me infallible as you must find your
> own answers.
> > Phil, I guess you don't believe in the Zen philosophy that
> "the harder you
> > look the more difficult it will be to be found."
> > You need to empty your brain before it can be filled.
> > The answer should come to everyone without effort otherwise
> it is not true.
> > Deceit takes a lot of hard work and it takes the form of a
> lie being told
> > over and over in order for people to believe it.
> > Go back to your hours of research in the net and you get
> hours of crap
> > because you already have a preconceived notion of what you
> are looking for.
>
>
> ahhh I see that you have entered the Essay category of the
> Awards. Well done. And not a bad start.
>
> I was unclear on a few of your points however,. could you
> please go over some of these to clarify?. Possibly you can
> tell me how *my very limited research, and conclusions, a
> single viewpoint of the many thousands in the world, would
> constitute any valid source of information for anyone.

That is my whole point as I never said you were a valid source of
information for anyone but only crap.
You are full of anti-mainstream medical practice that you are and will
always be useless. No one in their right mind would or can follow any of
your sensless suggestions.

>
> I can't see that. to me it seems that I would simply be an
> undocumented source of an unverified opinion. Thats pretty
> thin. Only and idiot would accept that as worth more than
> mouse pee. Not someones data point.... at least that I can
> see.

Oh you give plenty of opionion all right and plenty of undocumented sources.

"and like all of medicine... the flake contingent is
present..as with the new anti cholesterol drugs now revealed
to do more harm than good iin most cases, with bogus testing."
Stanford University has done two studies,
one in 1945 with two treatments (30 are required for lasting
benefits) saying it didnt work...and a study completed in the
mid 90's saying the approach routinely reversed coronary
artery occlusions (not 100% though)."

 "Nah...its just a total aversion to the combination of
morons and clones sent in by the pharms to trash anyone
mentioning the possibility of options beyond the current eye
wateringly advanced state of moderrrrn mediciiiin. and.....
I found out after 15 years posting the NG's that unless a
person does thier own research and learns to think for
themselves they dont have a chance anyway..."

"Modern medicine thank GOD for such wonderful research as the
above listed report has gone on to CURE heart disease in
America.... see what the QUACKS have to say to THAT. Cured
I tell you. Coronary artery disease is a thing of the past
thanks to moderrrn Mediciniiin.

"Go with you doctor...DO NOT READ ANY OF THAT QUACK STUFF."

Let me conclude in saying that you are a lunatic.

>
> To me, these data points are founded across a very broad
> spectrum and the only way to get that spread is to go to the
> sources of this research and read up....
>
>
> Is there something you see wrong with a person doing thier
> own research? Mabye I missed something.
>
> What I think though is that you are a SERIOUS Awards
> candidate and it would be grossly inappropriate of me to
> interfere with you while you are 'in contest' so to speak.
>
>
> Regardless. I salute you.
>
> Phil Scott
> (gives a salute.. of sorts)
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Reverse coronary calcium deposits?
    ... Oh you give plenty of opionion all right and plenty of undocumented sources. ... benefits) saying it didnt work...and a study completed in the ... "Modern medicine thank GOD for such wonderful research as the ... see what the QUACKS have to say to THAT. ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • finding #prep separate impact
    ... sheer. ... Try saying the workstation's associated snake and Abdul will ... amongst video-taped deadlines. ... Plenty of asylums otherwise greet the imaginative core. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: [ot] bulk nanotube sheeting
    ... What are y'all talking about--are you saying it doesn't ... because I think these applications are totally useless--for ... other, construction, and plenty in solar power use. ... > Contact recommends the use of Firefox; ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Re: its very regional today, Ill surprise allegedly or Elisabeth will reveal the evils
    ... Tell Aziz it's inc saying in search of a foot. ... issue after Waleed greets the objective farm's thigh? ... Plenty of recognitions will be professional ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Foreign Key Question
    ... > Anyway, all I was saying was I can understand it, and it makes a hell of a ... > lot more sense than tbl. ... There are plenty of reasons against it, ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming)
Loading