Re: QUACKS don't do research..or they LIE about it.. like the drug companies

From: Phil Scott (philscott888_at_sf.sbcglobal.net)
Date: 10/20/04 

Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:09:34 GMT

"Robert" <RobertJ@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:10nc77ki4d3sf73@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cl4ooe$3s1@library1.airnews.net...
> >
> > "Phil Scott" <philscott888@sf.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
message
> > news:2mgdd.32588$QJ3.9569@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> >
> > Garbage deleted.
> >
> > What is the difference between real medicine and
"alternative" medicine?

       errr what? Medicine is medicine...if it works the
people are healed and dont get sick as often. Some of the
drug companys products are good... and some are bogus...and
the pricing at 90% profits are entirely bogus.

    Many alternatives have been working for centuries in Japan
and china for instance both with vastly lower heart disease,
cancer and diabetes rates that the US 10 times lower.

   Your argument is BOGUS Robert.... quackery... just like
Vioxx and the anti cholesterol drugs.... and junk food....
bogus, and quack science. Engaged in fully by the drug
comanies...and recently caught for it.

   But good going Robert, the more you push the drug companies
the more espose goes out about them... and this stuff gets
cloned across the net... the public Robert is getting a clue
fast.

> >
> > Real medicine has been shown to work. As you point out,
the system is far
> > from perfect. Despite the fact that the drug companies are
selective about
> > the studies they release,

You are a drug company op or just uneducated Robert...the drug
companies produce SPUN results, in other words they fail to
list those who died, or they select only ideal candidates for
the test, then drop any that look like they may fail
early...skewing the results.. This is NOT news Robert.

Its been covered in recent posts that you obviously do not
read or are instructed not to read. The drug companies are
going to loose thier monopoly's over this range of issues.

>> at least they do REAL studies. And independent
> > studies have shown that various treatments work.

 a partial truth Robert... the other half of the studies are
bogus. and proven to be bogus repeatedly of late. Its this
second aspect Robert that is KILLING so many people what is
now the focus of attention.

Kapeesh Robert?
nahh of course not.... your IQ and integrity levels preclude
understanding. But do prompt this reply which is read by
hundreds and forwarded to other NG's...in the end Robert due
to your efforts thousand and ever growing thousands are
getting a clue and just saying no to the drug companies.

>>That is why so many
> > infectious diseases are so rare (polio, small-pox,
rubella-related birth
> > defects, Hib menigitis, measle, etc.) and why other
diseases can be
> treated
> > better than ever before, like cancer, which has a 50% cure
rate (and
> 75-80%
> > in kids).

  Partial truth Robert... used to justify 90% profits for the
drug companies, as millions die for lack of enough money to
buy the drugs...and cancer has not been cured..it is occurring
now at epidemic levels aong with diabetes in the US...but yes
the drugs do stretch out the survival times... and some are
cured... the net effect? Skyrocketing cancer, heart disease
and diabetes rates.

Impressive isnt it Robert... there are no such problems in
India or Japan..and..
You failed to mention the latest deadly fraud, the cholestrol
lowering drugs.

Jeff typed:
> I really think that most of the objection is because of the
cost of
> medication and not really if they work or not.

  yes 90% profits are obscene as well as millions die for lack
of the money to to buy those drugs that really are workable...
as hundreds of other drugs maim their victims. thats Quackery
at its finest.

Phil Scott

>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: QUACKS dont do research..or they LIE about it.. like the drug companies
    ... >the pricing at 90% profits are entirely bogus. ... Engaged in fully by the drug ... > But good going Robert, the more you push the drug companies ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)
  • Re: Cognitive problems with simvastatin?
    ... >> Robert wrote: ... >>> You believe that statins cause PD and you will never accept studies done ... >>> the drug companies showing otherwise so why force the drug companies to ... My assumption is that it is the FDA's responsibility to safeguard tne ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: Drug companies monitor web
    ... The exchange with Robert, with ... >>> experiment intended to illustrate just how much the drug companies ... > of traditional medicine and have a hatred for any alternative doctor ... scare people away from traditional medicine. ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: QUACKS dont do research..or they LIE about it.. like the drug companies
    ... > the pricing at 90% profits are entirely bogus. ... New drugs are dangerous in case nobody ever told you. ... > But good going Robert, the more you push the drug companies ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)
  • Re: Campaign launched against dietary supplements
    ... >> more bogus for the drug companies to do it their own research that they ... > I am referring to the patient paying directly for unproven treatment. ... All clinical trials are unproven and as to who pays for those trials, ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)
Quantcast