Re: This negative aricle about Antioxidants appeared in the Lancet
From: Dunne E. Dawe (never_at_never.again)
Date: 10/25/04
- Next message: Dunne E. Dawe: "Re: This negative aricle about Antioxidants appeared in the Lancet"
- Previous message: Dunne E. Dawe: "Re: This negative aricle about Antioxidants appeared in the Lancet"
- In reply to: peterb: "Re: This negative aricle about Antioxidants appeared in the Lancet"
- Next in thread: peterb: "Re: This negative aricle about Antioxidants appeared in the Lancet"
- Reply: peterb: "Re: This negative aricle about Antioxidants appeared in the Lancet"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:40:47 +0800
On 24 Oct 2004 21:31:19 -0700, peterb@mytrashmail.com (peterb) posted:
>Man-made chemicals, by contrast, cannot be utilized for energy
>production and are therefore more acutely toxic.
You premise is incorrect.
Your conclusion is therefore flawed. (Even if it were a logical
consequence.)
- Next message: Dunne E. Dawe: "Re: This negative aricle about Antioxidants appeared in the Lancet"
- Previous message: Dunne E. Dawe: "Re: This negative aricle about Antioxidants appeared in the Lancet"
- In reply to: peterb: "Re: This negative aricle about Antioxidants appeared in the Lancet"
- Next in thread: peterb: "Re: This negative aricle about Antioxidants appeared in the Lancet"
- Reply: peterb: "Re: This negative aricle about Antioxidants appeared in the Lancet"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]