Re: high dietary cholesterol = high blood cholesterol?
From: Dunne E. Dawe (never_at_never.again)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Robert: "Re: Todays Republican!"
- Previous message: Dunne E. Dawe: "Re: Dictionary of Alternative Medicine"
- In reply to: Mirek Fídler: "Re: high dietary cholesterol = high blood cholesterol?"
- Next in thread: Mirek Fídler: "Re: high dietary cholesterol = high blood cholesterol?"
- Reply: Mirek Fídler: "Re: high dietary cholesterol = high blood cholesterol?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:15:33 +0800
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:48:21 +0200, "Mirek FÃdler" <cxl@volny.cz>
posted:
>> >Triglycerides are an independent CVD risk factor, possibly highly
>> >predictive of heart attack, moreso than other lipids.
>>
>> Isn't most of this due to overweight, and lack of exercise?
>> Inheritance set aside, of course.
>
>Could be, but not always. Just to reject lipid profile improvement on
>low-carb as result of weight-loss is oversimplification.
It would appear so. But is there a problem with eating carbohydrates
when your weight is normal and you take adequate (much) exercsie?
I didn't think so, and a huge population of Asian rice eaters seem
healthy enough :-)
>In the first place, if you do this, you also accept that high fat diet is
>indeed effective for weight-loss (and in fact, it is, at least for some
>people - me included).
Well, as the composition of the diet is rather irrelevant to fat
storage status (weight is so often confusing people as it can be
water, muscle, bone, fat, glycogen and so on).
Fat store status is surely an artefact of energy balance.
But anyway, why must I accept that a "high fat diet is effective for
weight loss" when I claim that fatty acid problems are an artifact of
being overweight. What is the connection? I can't see it, I'm afraid.
>Also, dozens of studies really showed better lipid profile on low-carb than
>low-fat with the same weight-loss or same caloric intake.
But much less exercise? What weight loss and caloric intake were
involved here? By this, there should be billions of Asians in big
trouble.
>OTOH, it is also true that lipid profiles have they predictive power
>gathered on studying people on "standard" diet and it is in reality unknown
>whether altering it by diet (either low-fat or low-carb or any other) really
>has any effects on CAD (BTW, this is Ornish's defence of his vegetarian diet
>and he is partially correct here).
Well these Asians eat a relatively vegetarian diet. A pile of rice
"flavoured" by the meat/vegetable side dishes is typical.
>Anyway, if you are genetically predisposed to MetS/Type II diabetes (and a
>lot of obese people are), low-carb high-fat diet DOES improve established
>lipid profiles and also DOES stabilise blood glucose levels. These are
>facts.
Absolutely. However I often wonder what the dietary needs of
westerners would be if they had never overeaten (anything -- fat or
carb) and they all did heavy exercise every day. Just like it is
reasonable to assume we evolved as.
- Next message: Robert: "Re: Todays Republican!"
- Previous message: Dunne E. Dawe: "Re: Dictionary of Alternative Medicine"
- In reply to: Mirek Fídler: "Re: high dietary cholesterol = high blood cholesterol?"
- Next in thread: Mirek Fídler: "Re: high dietary cholesterol = high blood cholesterol?"
- Reply: Mirek Fídler: "Re: high dietary cholesterol = high blood cholesterol?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|