Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis
From: Dunne E. Dawe (never_at_never.again)
Date: 11/24/04
- Next message: Dunne E. Dawe: "Re: Study: Low-Fat Diets Better Long-Term"
- Previous message: MikeV: "Re: What is the w3/w6 ratio found in membranes?"
- Maybe in reply to: N-H-P: "Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis"
- Next in thread: N-H-P: "Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis"
- Reply: N-H-P: "Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis"
- Reply: N-H-P: "Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis"
- Reply: N-H-P: "Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis"
- Reply: Wolfbrother: "Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:18:40 +0800
On 16 Nov 2004 22:11:12 -0800, rangerhasten@yahoo.com (Wolfbrother)
posted:
>>
>> Therefore I concur, that the meta-analysis combined 19 individual
>> studies, eighteen of which showed no statistically significant
>> increase in mortality, squeezing out an overall finding of no
>> increased risk.
>
>
>What do you expect. It is just drug industry propaganda to scare
>people away from real health through vitamins/minerals.
You mean vits and mins from food? Then you have the food lobby...
>That is
>nothing new. They have been at war with vits/mins and supplements for
>decades. Sick people = $$$$$$
If you mean from a bottle, they sell the stuff, so why would they want
you not to take them?
- Next message: Dunne E. Dawe: "Re: Study: Low-Fat Diets Better Long-Term"
- Previous message: MikeV: "Re: What is the w3/w6 ratio found in membranes?"
- Maybe in reply to: N-H-P: "Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis"
- Next in thread: N-H-P: "Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis"
- Reply: N-H-P: "Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis"
- Reply: N-H-P: "Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis"
- Reply: N-H-P: "Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis"
- Reply: Wolfbrother: "Re: Vitamin E dangerous? - Analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|