Re: Rogue Chemist Unleashes Pharmaceutical Secrets

From: Mark Probert (Probert_at_lumbercartel.com)
Date: 12/08/04 

Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:43:20 -0500

"Happy Dog" <happydog@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:QOxtd.24478$l%5.1124475@news20.bellglobal.com...
> <awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > Shoot! I understand the so-called scientific method. It was so simple
> > it was a ninth grade lesson.
>
> One that you failed to understand. Like most spammers, you rely on
> anecdote, conspiracy and vitriol. Where's the scientific method employed
in
> the claims at your spam website?
>
> > What you don't understand is that what happens in FDA-approval process
> > is NOT the "scientific method."
>
> Correct. Nobody here said otherwise.
>
> > It's the "commerical science" method.
> > Now don't misunderstand me. I am not opposed to commercial endeavors. I
> > am opposed to the racketeering and oppression employed, with the FDA
> > acting as the mafia-style enforcer.
>
> I doubt that you'll find many friends of the FDA here. But, you're a
> spammer. And, at least, equally despised.

Wrong. The FDA is less despised simply because they are under organized
public scrutiny. Even some of them recognize that there is a problem and
they are looking to address it.

Spammers, OTOH, deny that they are a blight on all forms of international
communications.

Relevant Pages