Re: Interesting arcticle....
From: Anthony (jawpw1_at_nospam.aol.com)
Date: 01/13/05
- Next message: usual suspect: "Re: Red Meat NO GOOD, Veggies no protection.... NOW WHAT?"
- Previous message: pearl: "Re: Red Meat NO GOOD, Veggies no protection.... NOW WHAT?"
- In reply to: Mirek Fídler: "Interesting arcticle...."
- Next in thread: Bob M: "Re: Interesting arcticle...."
- Reply: Bob M: "Re: Interesting arcticle...."
- Reply: MU: "Re: Interesting arcticle...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:40:13 -0500
"Mirek Fídler" <cxl@volny.cz> wrote in message
news:34mt7vF4dfhe6U1@individual.net...
> http://www.theomnivore.com/Diet%20ShowdownAtkinsvsOrnishvsZonevsWeight%20Watchers.html
>
> I especially like the part about final macronutrient breakdown comparison
> between atkins and ornish :)
>
> Anyway, I like many recommendations of that guy. ~100g of right carbs/day
> without carb counting, finding your CCL, ketosis etc... is something I
> think works best...
>
> Mirek
What startled me is that this study was published in the journal of the AMA,
and so presumably has a good deal of credibility, yet the article that you
reference shows that the study was seriously flawed.
Interesting to note that cholesterol improvement correlated with weight loss
rather than diet.
- Next message: usual suspect: "Re: Red Meat NO GOOD, Veggies no protection.... NOW WHAT?"
- Previous message: pearl: "Re: Red Meat NO GOOD, Veggies no protection.... NOW WHAT?"
- In reply to: Mirek Fídler: "Interesting arcticle...."
- Next in thread: Bob M: "Re: Interesting arcticle...."
- Reply: Bob M: "Re: Interesting arcticle...."
- Reply: MU: "Re: Interesting arcticle...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|