Re: vitamins
andrewvecsey_at_hotmail.com
Date: 01/15/05
- Next message: Ron: "Re: Red Meat NO GOOD, Veggies no protection.... NOW WHAT?"
- Previous message: Ron: "Re: Red Meat NO GOOD, Veggies no protection.... NOW WHAT?"
- In reply to: John Sankey: "Re: vitamins"
- Next in thread: John Sankey: "Re: vitamins"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Jan 2005 08:42:18 -0800
The RDA for omega3 that you state in your page is not correct. It is 2g
to 9g
regards
andrew vecsey
see paper on omega3 at
http://www.geocities.com/andrewvecsey/omega3.html
John Sankey wrote:
> There is a widespread opinion in books, and particularly in this
> group, that it is impossible to get all the nutrients you need from a
> 2000 calorie diet. In fact, one poster claimed that 7000 calories a
> day is needed to get the RDA of calcium.
>
> See http://sankey.ws/dietpills.html for a specific example of a diet
> that will do just that.
>
> Not that I'd really want to eat it! But, facts are facts.
> Furthermore, it is possible to obtain all the nutrients for which I
> can get numbers with only 1500 calories/day.
- Next message: Ron: "Re: Red Meat NO GOOD, Veggies no protection.... NOW WHAT?"
- Previous message: Ron: "Re: Red Meat NO GOOD, Veggies no protection.... NOW WHAT?"
- In reply to: John Sankey: "Re: vitamins"
- Next in thread: John Sankey: "Re: vitamins"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|