Re: HIV (Was Re: Coffee Consumption and the Link to Cardiovascular Disease)

mattlb_at_angelfire.com
Date: 02/14/05 

Date: 14 Feb 2005 10:59:52 -0800

montygram wrote:
> The HIV "studies" you cite are same old pathetic stuff I've seen in
my
> extensive research. You don't seem to have enough gray matter to
> realize that first, they assume that HIV is causing all kinds of
> problems, then if anyone tests HIV antibody positive, they say all
the
> problems are the result of HIV activity - without any evidence. In
one
> of the studies you cited, it is stated: " Recent insights, however,
> indicate that HIV-1 infection more actively promotes cancer growth."
> Where are these recent insights published? I've been trying to find
> such data for many months now.

Well now I've told you about oncogenes, you have another term to put
into the search engine. Alternatively, the review paper itself will
obviously tell you.

> In fact, the recent evidence points to
> the contrary.

To paraphrase you: Where is this recent evidence published? Or were you
suggesting the stuff you quoted from 1995 was recent? What's the date
on your calendar?

<snip the rest since GMCarter already shone the cold light of day on
it>

MattLB

Quantcast