Re: Laurie's intellectual integrity.

From: TC (tunderbar_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/23/05 

Date: 23 Mar 2005 13:56:59 -0800

You will have to somehow convince us that there exists even a shred of
scientific evidence of man's supposed frugivorous nature. Good luck
with that, you will need it.

Your statement that humans are frugivorous, by itself, completely
anihilates any intellectual integrity you may be pretending to possess.
It clearly shows your abject ignorance.

BTW, I have read a significant number of bio-chem texts and I strongly
recommend that you do so as well before you further embarass yourself.

TC

Laurie wrote:
> "TC" <tunderbar@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1111611099.602574.180320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > I am not pretending to be an authority on the physiological effects
of
> > alcohol, ...
> You said: "Now I am *sure* that a bit of alcohol in one form or
another
> can have some small positive effect on our physiology and I am *sure*
that
> wine may have some as well"
> Is there any particular reason you avoided the issue and can not
support
> your claims?? Isn't "sure" and "may have" rather contradictory??
>
> > If you can't find it, that, my dear, is your problem.
> And, if you can not support your claims made in public, it is not
only
> your personal problem, my dear, but everyone's. What if people
actually
> believed your unsupportable claims?
>
> > Frugivorous!!!! Bwah Ha ha ha ha.....
> Is this really the best scientifically-valid rebuttal you can
think of?
> All education is self-education; try some.
> Precisely the kind of idiotic, juvenile, evasive, non-response,
rather
> common to cultural-omnivores who are totally unfamiliar with their
own
> physiology.
> http://www.ecologos.org/anatomy.htm
> http://www.ecologos.org/omni.htm
>
> But, why don't you prove that humans are carnivores, as you
imply, and
> offer some scientifically-credible physiological/biochemical
support??
> Because you can not!
> Do you deny that you are a frugivorous, tropical ape??
> Is not YOUR DNA 98+% identical to chimps? Or, are you really not

> human??
>
> > I partake of [alcohol] often.
> While you are writing these nonsensical posts, no doubt. Sober
up and
> crack a biochem book<G>.
>
> > The trick is in not overdoing it.
> Well, guess what, biochemistry occurs on a molecule-by-molecule
basis,
> so there is no lower, "safe" limit for toxins, as you state, or for
toxic
> pollutants, as the EPA fantasizes.
>
> > too damned funny.... and idiotic... and *you* propose to lecture
*us*.
> I am not 'lecturing' to anyone, I present well-support arguments
and
> data to those who sincerely ARE interested in human diet.
> You, clearly, are neither sincere (except in denigrating yourself
with
> juvenile personal insults) nor are you interested enough in human
> physiology/biochemistry to learn enough to write a coherent, credible

> article, nor can you present a logical critique or other concepts.
>
> Laurie

Quantcast