Re: Merck intentionally misled the public and the medical community
- From: "Robert" <Robertitsme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:11:02 -0700
"TC" <tunderbar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1114630203.300659.164000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You have got to be kidding!
>
> So you are saying that the Pharma strategy to charge US citizens
> extraordinarily high mark-ups on prescription drugs is really a system
> designed by the US regulatory agencies and Pharma to keep drugs out of
> the poorer peoples hands in order to protect them from the harmful
No. The pharm drugs want as much money for each drug they can get away with.
In the US they charge way more and as a result fewer people are on them.
Some insurance companies do not pay for newer drugs when older ones are
available.
The US doesn't regulate price like in Canada.
If you don't have the money to pay then naturally the poor don't buy them.
The pharm companies don't care about the poor. It is a business and they
higher the price is fine for them. Not so in Canada.
> effects of the toxic drugs? And the cheaper drugs in Canada are there
> because the Canadian govt has sold out and they willingly allow the
> drug manufacturers to poison the populace and they conspire to make
> them cheap enough so that everyone can afford the presciption poisons?.
Not only do they allow a cheaper price to poison the canadian people they
allow americans to buy them as well. Canadians don't care about safety only
the money they can get from drug sales.
Money is the key. The lawsuits are about money. The sales are about money.
Where you buy the drug is about money. Who sales the drugs cheaper as in
mass buying that canada does is about money.
>
> Are you on drugs?
You are a candian so you will be the first to know if I need to buy any off
of you. If anything happens to me I will sue Canada and the pharm companies
for millions of dollars and then say it is about health and not money in
your government not protecting me.
Why don't you warn me now about any new canadian drugs under development
that your country wants to make money on?
I think they should charge a thousand dollars a pill but not in Canada.
>
> TC
>
> Robert wrote:
> > "TC" <tunderbar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1114609592.997823.121940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > So your point is what? That Pharma has co-opted the drug approval
> > process in Canada too? Big surprise. Duh!
> >
> > Not only that my friend but drugs are much more, more, more cheaper.
> Their
> > system approves cheap toxic drugs compared to the US. Look at the
> rediculous
> > price they were selling the drug.
> > Your system is unsafe and intentionally exposes the patients to
> dangerous
> > new drugs.
> > In the US the newer drugs are much more expensive and so fewer people
> are
> > exposed to them.
> > The thirty million people without insurance can not afford them as a
> result
> > they must use cheaper older drugs with known safety track records.
> >
> >
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Too much Zinc, too little Copper
- Next by Date: Cellular medicine a new science?
- Previous by thread: Re: Merck intentionally misled the public and the medical community
- Next by thread: Re: Merck intentionally misled the public and the medical community
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
