Cognitive Dissonant Oxymoron: "Dictatorship of Relativi


"Carmen Miranda" wrote...


>>sorry if i sound 'patronizing', it is not my intent, just a fair
>>warning that he has no interest in 'communication' at all...
>
>
> Funny, that's exactly what I think of you and Ann. Minus all the
> metaphysical nonsense of course.

### - yeah well it wouldn't be the first, or even the 'second' time *you've*
ended up on the wrong side of the fence & in the *** would it heh
(scientology AND castaneda??? sheesh :) - so what exactly is it you feel
that makes 'you' suddenly the master of truth in any of these matters? - i
mean, gimmie one good reason why anyone should ever consider 'anything' you
think as being even 'remotely' correct! heh heh :)



>
> I will admit that it is interesting how the delusional frequently try
> to elevate themselves and dehumanize those who refute their absurd
> beliefs (e.g. "hungry ghosts").

### - obvious case of pot-kettle-black :)





>
> What it comes down to is simple: whenever you see a person claiming
> to be "egoless", stand forewarned that there exists a HIGH probability
> that that person has very serious ego problems due to being largely
> inadequate in the real world.

### - possibly... but what we're *actually* interested in/more concerned
with instead of hanging about going: look there's another fake, and another
one! and this one's fake as well!! etc etc, IS 'precisely' that tiny
percentage your "HIGH probability" (as opposed to a guaranteed total) allows
for as being the more 'genuine' article... (after all, plus as i'm sure
you'll agree by now: there's no more time to be wasted on 'fakes' hehe:)





>
> Similarly, if you see anyone making an argument such as "all words are
> lies", rest assured that you are conversing with a veritable master of
> self-deception who has a real problem accepting the truth about
> anything.

### - uh-huh, uh-huh... well maybe... i dunno :) :) :)






.

Quantcast