Re: Does eating carbohydrates lead to metabolic disorders?
- From: "Robert" <Robertitsme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:30:22 -0700
"TC" <tunderbar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1117563953.683323.318380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> calyps...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > "Nice try there, calypso. Pretty damned machiavellian and very
disturbing
> > that these two industry whores would put this kind of junk science out
> > there, and that the journal would publish this marketting crap."
> >
> > What specific part of the study is invalid for being a fraud or
deliberate
> > dishonesty? That is a methodology question and must be answered
likewise,
> > otherwise irrelevant. Can you provide research to the contrary and have
> > you veted it for disclosure as it is the polcy of that journal?
> > How does a conspiracy theory about a drug company relate to an study on
> > the level of insulin resistance with food consuption? That is a
> > philosophy of science question and must be answered likewise.
>
> The entire study is invalid because of the simple fact that the two
> researchers have direct financial interest in a company whose sales
> will be directly affected by the results of the study.
>
> This is not a conspiracy, nor have I ever implied or suggested a
> conspiracy. I've never used the term. That is entirely your construct.
>
> This is just an example of *common marketing practices* in the food and
> pharmaceutical industries. It is not science, it is marketing, and it
> should be treated as such.
These are studies mandated by the FDA and are marketing studies.
Tell the FDA you want to market something and they say to do a study.
All studies are marketing in nature. Do one study that shows increase heart
attacks and the product is taken off the market. Show one study that says it
prevents heart attacks then it can be marketed and FDA approved for that
use.
One and the same.
>
> You may wish to have a closer look at the studies methodology, and the
> data collected, etc, to see if it meets any scientific standards and
> use that to decide on its validity. Knock yourself out. But, it is
> obvious that this study is not science, it is most definitely
> marketing.
>
> TC
>
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Does eating carbohydrates lead to metabolic disorders?
- Next by Date: Re: Does eating carbohydrates lead to metabolic disorders?
- Previous by thread: Re: Does eating carbohydrates lead to metabolic disorders?
- Next by thread: Re: Does eating carbohydrates lead to metabolic disorders?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
