Re: Is butter really bad for you?

Everyone who claims not to be consufed is just a presumptuous liar
The truth is that we're all resorting to nutritional studies to choose
what to believe and what to do in our everyday life. If it weren't for
those studies there wouldn't even be this newsgroup or all these
controversials about nutrition

And those studies are clearly controversial
Why the studies that back up the position of those who claim that
cholesterol and sat fat are harmless and we should just eat animal
foods or that we're healthier while on ketosis should be more or less
reliable than studies that back up the opposite position

I agreed for some time that since the body produces its own saturated
fat and cholesterol dietary sat fat and cholesterol had not much impact
on one's health either way

But, I would like to know how Atkins/Bernstein/Eades supporters would
explain this: Angiology. 2000; 51(10):817-26.

People following high fat diets had a very dangerous 40% reduction of
coronary blood flow. On the other hand those consuming less animal
foods and more plant foods increased their coronary blood flow and
literally cleaned their clogged arteries

Maybe the truth is in the middle: more plant foods and less animal
foods like the diet of all primates and animals who are not naturally
equipped to hunt a lot of their foods

I'm confused, and you should be too ...whether ideology, belief, guru,
diet you're following there are as many evidences against it as the
evidences pro it are

David

.

Quantcast