Re: Is butter really bad for you?
- From: throop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (David R. Throop)
- Date: 6 May 2006 22:44:16 -0500
In article <1146967757.109090.107570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Davide <davideb_music@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
But, I would like to know how Atkins/Bernstein/Eades supporters would
explain this: Angiology. 2000; 51(10):817-26.
People following high fat diets had a very dangerous 40% reduction of
coronary blood flow. On the other hand those consuming less animal
foods and more plant foods increased their coronary blood flow and
literally cleaned their clogged arteries
Davide,
I could perhaps hazard a critique if you told us more. Angiology's
online archives only go back to 2004. http://ang.sagepub.com/
Want to give us a title, author and abstract?
My first questions in this study are going to be:
* How much and what kind of starch were they eating? I'm pretty
convinced that the combination of high blood glucose and high fat
will plug your arteries. Something has to go. Cutting fat is
one strategy, as long as your pancreas is in good shape. Cutting
starch can also work.
* How much MUFA were they getting? What kind of PUFA? What did
their omega-3 / 6 profiles look like?
Hey, I admit that fat is horrible for you. It's just that
carbohydrate is even worse. :-)
DRT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is butter really bad for you?
- From: Davide
- Re: Is butter really bad for you?
- References:
- Re: Is butter really bad for you?
- From: Davide
- Re: Is butter really bad for you?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is butter really bad for you?
- Next by Date: Re: Is butter really bad for you?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is butter really bad for you?
- Next by thread: Re: Is butter really bad for you?
- Index(es):