Re: Feds question vitamins' vitality
- From: "TC" <tunderbar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 May 2006 12:54:35 -0700
gohdiot
Mr. Natural-Health wrote:
TC wrote:
NEWSFLASH: YOU missed it!!!!!!
Idiot.
And you call me a rube.
TC
TC's persistence in using "it" rather than fully articulating his
position, denotes his mental illness.
You have my condolences, Idiot. :)
Mr. Natural-Health wrote:
NEWSFLASH: YOU made no such conclusion in your original post.
Show me your original commentary, where you make a conclusion of any
sort.
I am getting really sick of the A-Holes on these ngs who think
everybody has ESP.
The only thing I see is the A-Hole called TC posting a stupid article
that knocks the value of taking supplements.
You have my condolences.
Where do these rubes come from???
TC wrote:
Mr. Natural-Health wrote:
TC wrote:
Mr. Natural-Health wrote:
TC wrote:
The W.K. Kellogg Foundation has committed $2.5 million in a challengehttp://www.wkkf.org/default.aspx?tabid=78&NID=68&LanguageID=0
grant to the IOM to help the Institute extend the impact of its work.
Don't you read what you are posting, TC?
W.K. Kellogg was the brother of John Harvey Kellogg. Will started the
Breakfast Cereal Gold Rush by commercialising Corn Flakes. He is the
founder of the Kellogg breakfast cereal company. These people were
selling boxes of this stuff that cost next to nothing to produce for
real money. W.K. Kellogg became a multi-millionaire overnight.
Who do you think put grains at the bottom of the USDA Food Guide
Pyramid if it was not the likes of W.K. Kellogg?
Let us face it, TC, you are as big an idiot as they come (pun
intended).
Ha, ... Hah, Ha!
You have my condolences for champing the King of the health benefits of
eating grains for breakfast.
Hmmmm.
1) I post a report about the absurdity of a group of medical "experts"
are questioning the essentiality of nutrients that are essential by
definition, and
2) then I point out that these "experts" are connected by money to a
major player in the food industry that has a history of producing some
of the the most nutrient-deficient food marketted to man, ie. grains,
(whole and refined)
Gee, TC now thinks that he is Christ-on-Earth. :(
Dream on TC, you did no such thing except in your wildest dreams.
Let's review what I posted:
*****quote one ********
"For the average healthy American, there's simply not enough evidence
to
tell if taking vitamins is a good or bad idea, said Dr. Michael
McGinnis of the Institute of Medicine, who led the NIH panel's review.
"We don't know a great deal," he said, calling for more rigorous
research.
Moreover, McGinnis added, "The product with which we're dealing is
virtually unregulated," meaning there are even questions about how the
bottles' labels convey what's really inside.
*********
Notice that "Dr" McGinnis is from the Institute of Medicine or IOM.
***** quote two *****
Funding Priorities at the IOM
http://www.iom.edu/CMS/3239/33048.aspx
Unrestricted Annual Fund Support
The IOM's body of work and the values that guide its
operations--independence, objectivity, expertise, and grounding in
evidence--are unmatched. While many of the Institute's studies are
requested and funded by the federal government, the IOM relies on ***
private funding *** for other initiatives that are essential for
advancing and disseminating scientific knowledge to improve human
health.
Unrestricted Annual Fund support helps advance our work in areas such
as measuring and improving the quality of health care, uninsurance,
childhood obesity, and health literacy. *** Private funding *** enables
the IOM to pursue these and other significant opportunities, to lead
meaningful change in the nation's health care system, and to improve
health nationally and globally.
*******
So private funding is what propels their research.
**** quote three *****
The Kellogg Health of the Public Fund
The W.K. Kellogg Foundation has committed $2.5 million in a challenge
grant to the IOM to help the Institute extend the impact of its work.
The Kellogg Health of the Public Fund enables the Institute to expand
its outreach by:
***********
The upshot is that Kellogg funds the IOM and the IOM's good Dr McGinnis
comes out and questions the usefullness of vitamins. And that falls in
quite nicely with the fact that Kellogg's produces food with no
nutritional value whatsoever. Why produce real nutrition when doctors
say that real nutrition is a fallacy.
TC
.
- References:
- Feds question vitamins' vitality
- From: TC
- Re: Feds question vitamins' vitality
- From: Mr. Natural-Health
- Re: Feds question vitamins' vitality
- From: TC
- Re: Feds question vitamins' vitality
- From: Mr. Natural-Health
- Re: Feds question vitamins' vitality
- From: TC
- Re: Feds question vitamins' vitality
- From: Mr. Natural-Health
- Re: Feds question vitamins' vitality
- From: TC
- Re: Feds question vitamins' vitality
- From: Mr. Natural-Health
- Feds question vitamins' vitality
- Prev by Date: Re: French Paradox - is it the wine?
- Next by Date: Re: studies on which weight-loss advice works best across all who read it?
- Previous by thread: Re: Feds question vitamins' vitality
- Next by thread: Re: Feds question vitamins' vitality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|