Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- From: outsor@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 14 Jun 2006 13:23:51 GMT
Ah, whatever was going on it had nothing to do with carbs, which were held
equal and the kind of fat varied. So the real question is why some fat
sources cause greater fat storage and retention then do other types. Fat
contains alot of water which is why weight loss involves liquid loss
especially in the first period of loss. So the question here is why
should the saturated fats cause retention and not the less saturated
forms. The answer will have nothing to do with the 2nd law but with
different metabolic paths.
"I think that a couple of people may care that there is yet another
exception to the direct application of the laws of thermodynamics to
human weight maintenance.
Yet another piece of scientific evidence that says that calories are
not the final word on fat storage or fat loss in humans.
Calories mean squat."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- From: Ron Peterson
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- From: MattLB
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- From: TC
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- References:
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- From: TC
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Prev by Date: Re: Iron Deficiency
- Next by Date: Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Previous by thread: Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Next by thread: Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|