Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- From: "MattLB" <mattlb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Jun 2006 09:59:18 -0700
outsor@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Ah, whatever was going on it had nothing to do with carbs, which were held
equal and the kind of fat varied. So the real question is why some fat
sources cause greater fat storage and retention then do other types. Fat
contains alot of water
Pardon? Are you talking about fat or fat cells? Either way it's not
true.
which is why weight loss involves liquid loss
especially in the first period of loss.
Water loss is usually attributed to breakdown of glycogen, a very
osmotically-active molecule, reducing the attraction for water.
So the question here is why
should the saturated fats cause retention and not the less saturated
forms.
It's trans fats not saturated fats that were being tested and caused
retention. Trans fatty acids are unsaturated.
MattLB
.
- References:
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- From: TC
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- From: outsor
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Prev by Date: NIH Researcher Gave Samples to Pfizer, Pocketed $600,000
- Next by Date: Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Previous by thread: Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Next by thread: Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|