Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- From: Jim Chinnis <jchinnis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:23:38 GMT
"TC" <tunderbar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in part:
I think that a couple of people may care that there is yet another
exception to the direct application of the laws of thermodynamics to
human weight maintenance.
Yet another piece of scientific evidence that says that calories are
not the final word on fat storage or fat loss in humans.
Calories mean squat.
Huh? Over a six year period, a 5.4% weight gain effect could be easily
explained by different effects on muscle, exercise tolerance/predisposition,
sleep, or any number of things that would have meant the trans-fat group
burned fewer calories than the cis-fat group.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- From: TC
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- References:
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- From: Mr. Natural-Health
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- From: TC
- Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Prev by Date: Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Next by Date: Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Previous by thread: Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Next by thread: Re: A calorie is NOT a calorie!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading