Re: Can we discuss Fish pls?
- From: Matti Narkia <mna@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:01:27 +0300
On 20 Sep 2006 03:50:31 -0700, "Blueshark" <duncan10@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What are nutritional up-sides and down-sides of eating fish?As gentle as possible, meaning low temperature. Oven cooking in lowish
Is there a preferable cooking method ?
temperature may be the best. Avoid overcooking. Then there's of course
raw fish, for example sushi and gravad lax (salted raw salmon).
Farmed fish or Caught Fish?Abosulutely caught fish. Quality of fish depends on what it eats and I
don't think that the stuff fed to farmed fish can produce as high
quality fish as caught fish. And farmed fish moves less than wild fish
may therefore have higher amount of saturated fats. Farmed fish has
also much higher arachidonic acid content than wild fish. Arachidonic
acid is a precursor of inflammation mediators and too much of it
promotes inflammation.
Does pollution affect the nutritional value?It may, at least in certain areas, but in general benefits of eating
fish are much greater than the potential harmful effects caused by
pollution.
// I currently do not eat fish, but have done in the past. Would likeFish is continuously discussed in this group and new benefits are
to know your opinions on it.
still emerging. I suggest that you search for the old articles in this
group and do also some web searches.
--
Matti Narkia
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can we discuss Fish pls?
- From: Blueshark
- Re: Can we discuss Fish pls?
- References:
- Can we discuss Fish pls?
- From: Blueshark
- Can we discuss Fish pls?
- Prev by Date: Re: Researchers discover how a high-fat diet causes type 2 diabetes
- Next by Date: Re: Why Omnivore?
- Previous by thread: Re: Can we discuss Fish pls?
- Next by thread: Re: Can we discuss Fish pls?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|