Re: Distance Running Is Tied to Skin Cancer Risk - Dougie Freese, what's up with that?
- From: Enrico C <use_replyto_address@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:11:23 +0100
On 26 Nov 2006 10:51:50 -0800, TC wrote:
If sun exposure is the main problem, then ought we not to see
significantly more occurrences of skin cancers in the equatorial
latitudes throughout recorded history.
Darker skins?
Different genetics?
And conversely, ought we not to
see significantly less skin cancers among those living in northern
latitudes throughout recorded history?
Lighter skins?
Different genetics?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Distance Running Is Tied to Skin Cancer Risk - Dougie Freese, what's up with that?
- From: TC
- Re: Distance Running Is Tied to Skin Cancer Risk - Dougie Freese, what's up with that?
- From: NoOption5L
- Re: Distance Running Is Tied to Skin Cancer Risk - Dougie Freese, what's up with that?
- From: Doug Freese
- Re: Distance Running Is Tied to Skin Cancer Risk - Dougie Freese, what's up with that?
- From: TC
- Distance Running Is Tied to Skin Cancer Risk - Dougie Freese, what's up with that?
- Prev by Date: Re: Distance Running Is Tied to Skin Cancer Risk - Dougie Freese, what's up with that?
- Next by Date: Re: Painkiller Abuse More Common in America Than Heroin
- Previous by thread: Re: Distance Running Is Tied to Skin Cancer Risk - Dougie Freese, what's up with that?
- Next by thread: Re: Distance Running Is Tied to Skin Cancer Risk - Dougie Freese, what's up with that?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
