Re: WARNING: Industry is Blogging These Newsgroups to Impact the Public Discourse on Matters of Public Health

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 06:07:42 +0000 (UTC), schultr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Richard Schultz) wrote:


: I've said your words identify your motives, and they do.

You've also said that the motives are irrelevant if the words are true.

And I would say, "The words are irrelevant so
long as the MOTIVES are true to your POV."

For we must in the final analysis realize that what
passes for TRUTH is what one can get away with...

And NO,... this doesn't stand against the principle
of Peer Reviewed Science.

Take Global Warming for instance... The 'industry
experts' (whores for big oil) have effectively injected
THEIR VIEWPOINT into the discussion in the name
of FAIR AND BALANCED, irregardless of the fact that
virtually NO scientist with such experience NOT PAID by
the 'industry' for their opinion is virtually certain that there
is a profound relationship between human activity in the last
150 years and the rise of Global Warming.

Same thing goes for all those BS studies we get in the MSM
everyday about how one week it is GOOD to EAT CHOCOLATE
and the next CANDY IS FORBODEN. Same with TEA, ORANGE
JUICE, cranberry juice, (now there's a good one,) wine, and all
the rest of the BEST DIETS for a DAY.

Ned
.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast