Re: cooked food = junk food?
- From: coonskin@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 29 Dec 2006 02:13:50 GMT
Who cares? Tradition is not a defence of anything. And furthermore, webetter,
don't
need to show that there are any 100% raw eating cultures that fair
we only need ones that eat more raw and do better, and of course showthat
is due to the raw food. This evidence is available in the literature.
So point us to the data for this assertion, web sources if you please,
defining "do better" along the way of course.
snip
I don't need to offer any critique of cooking. However, those whopropose
it, most certainly need credible science to support the practice, sowhere
is it?
The usual order of such things is he who has an idea is duty bound to
also
provide evidence, not those to whom it is offered to provide same for
any
alternative ideas they might hold to the contrary. We can proceed when
we
see your "do better" evidence.
.
- References:
- Re: cooked food = junk food?
- From: John Coleman
- Re: cooked food = junk food?
- Prev by Date: Re: cooked food = junk food?
- Next by Date: Need Help with Vitamin Regiment
- Previous by thread: Re: cooked food = junk food?
- Next by thread: book on nutrition?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
