Re: Allopathic arrogance from 1864 to 2007



On Jan 24, 1:03 pm, capm...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
"OK, right off the bat, we know that *you* are here not to debate
anything logically, but simply to try to cast aspersions on anything
that is contrary to your food industry cult agenda. Your asking me to
provide proof is just a ruse for you to accuse me of cherry picking
when I do provide proof.

So I see no reason to provide proof to *you* just for your predictable
accusations of cherry picking.

I provide information to everyone to read and to prompt discussion. If
you disagree with the info, fine, if you agree, even better. But in the
end, I don't give a rats ass what *you* think. So take your food
industry cult troll garbage and go to aitch eeee double hockey sticks."

Smile, continued "proof" is not yet seen, but squeals of "uncle" are,
so be it.

Funny how the one who advocates the so-called "evidence-based"
allopathic paradigm has yet to provide any evidence whatsoever to
support his food industry cult agenda.

That means that you've lost the debate.

TC

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Allopathic arrogance from 1864 to 2007
    ... but simply to try to cast aspersions on anything ... that is contrary to your food industry cult agenda. ... provide proof is just a ruse for you to accuse me of cherry picking ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)
  • Re: Allopathic arrogance from 1864 to 2007
    ... presumes to provide the support asked ofhim?"So you can immediately label it as cherry picking without even glancing ... That is what we are asking you to provide support for, ... that is contrary to your food industry cult agenda. ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)