Re: A cure for diabetes from 1806?
- From: "TC" <tunderbar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Feb 2007 19:37:43 -0800
On Feb 3, 8:36 pm, Jim Chinnis <jchin...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
NoOptio...@xxxxxxx wrote in part:
Real food is always more nutrient dense than fake over processed
manufactured grain foods. Always.
No ***. That's why whole grains are finally, finally, starting to
get their due.
Patrick
Fake, over-processed manufactured (feedlot) beef has similar shortcomings.
It's corn walking, with hormones, antibiotics, etc. added.
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchin...@xxxxxxxxxxxx
You're kidding, right?
Not all feedlots feed their cattle on corn, hormones, antibiotics etc.
That is one of the most sweeping, presumptious, unrealistic statements
I've heard in a long time.
TC
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A cure for diabetes from 1806?
- From: Jim Chinnis
- Re: A cure for diabetes from 1806?
- From: capmack
- Re: A cure for diabetes from 1806?
- References:
- Re: A cure for diabetes from 1806?
- From: NoOption5L
- Re: A cure for diabetes from 1806?
- From: Jim Chinnis
- Re: A cure for diabetes from 1806?
- Prev by Date: Re: "Interesterified" fats poised to replace trans fats, but specter of CVD risk factor effects looms here, too
- Next by Date: Re: Whole Milk Conclusion
- Previous by thread: Re: A cure for diabetes from 1806?
- Next by thread: Re: A cure for diabetes from 1806?
- Index(es):