Re: A cure for diabetes from 1806?

On Feb 5, 9:59 pm, spam...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 5 Feb 2007 06:59:30 -0800, "TC" <tunder...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

*** you. I know more about what I speak than you, the moron that
equates all carbohydrates foods to sugar. Fucking moron.

Umm, I think you have gotten your correspondents in a knot.
I still have not heard from you what dietary carbs you think are not
effectively sugars. I guess you can't.

"Effectively", eh? Interesting attempt at a post post addendum. So
when I speak of sugar, you think all dietary carbs, eh? Even when I am
clearly and obviously speaking of sugar, eh? Oh, am I confusing you?
Should I dumb it down some more and specify 100% pure white sugar
crystals, or 100% hfcs, just so idiots like you aren't confused? I can
see how some abject moron would not be able to differentiate between
whole food carbs and pure sugar, or even blood glucose. I just don't
understand how, if someon is that stupid, as you apparently are, how
can you come into ths ng and even attempt to argue with tose of us who
aren't nearly as intellectually challenged? Retard.

TC


Take your "economic models" and your pie-in-the-sky theories about
things you have zero understanding, and shove them where the sun don't
shine.

What a fuckin' idiot.

Your family farmers probably went broke because they were related to
you.

You show such a shallow level of knowledge on every topic that you
touch upon that you embarass us all every time you spout your
inanities in this ng.

That's a keeper!

TC - Paid to denigrate the grain industry

jackass


.