Re: laetrile


<capmack@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:45d636e3$0$259$1c4686b2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"You would think that ANY possible treatments for such a condition as
CANCER would have been thoroughly studied, inside and out, until there
was no doubt about its efficacy, one way or another. Especially with the
extremely limited treatment options available and their not altogether
stellar results.

For any such possible treatment to NOT have been thoroughly investigated
is blody criminal."

The results in the post are those from the advocates which showed they
were crap research. Valid scientific studies were done seperatly and
when the first few showed no effect at all no more were done. If you
declare that picking your nose cures cancer and one well done studie
shows it doesn't, nothingmore need be done.

I beg to differ. Not only was did Laetrile not help, it was also harmful to some.

So when there was an effect, it was negative.

Jeff

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: laetrile
    ... CANCER would have been thoroughly studied, inside and out, until there ... was no doubt about its efficacy, ... extremely limited treatment options available and their not altogether ... be all adhering to the highest standards of modern science. ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)
  • Re: laetrile
    ... CANCER would have been thoroughly studied, inside and out, until there ... was no doubt about its efficacy, ... extremely limited treatment options available and their not altogether ... Because you are useless trolls more interested in ...
    (sci.med.nutrition)
Loading